【24h】

Effect of carbon mitigation measures in China:Study based on TIMES model

机译:碳缓解措施对我国的影响:基于时代模型研究

获取原文

摘要

Rapid economy development in China has led to growing demands for better air quality and human welfare.The interaction between carbon mitigation and local pollutant reduction measures is always ignored.This paper presents an assessment of environmental effect in transportation sector.Based on China-TIMES model,we designed four scenarios describe future energy strategies: business-as-usual(BAU)scenario,speeding up elimination of the yellow standard car(EPM)scenario,new technology promotion and fuel economy standard upgrade(TPS)scenario and fuel tax scenario(FTAX).Results show us that the EPM scenario and TPS scenario have better continuously mitigation affect both for carbon and local pollutant reduction.And the EPM scenario helps to utilize the transportation structure most.For the local pollutants co-benefits,the results show that EPM and FTAX scenario have better co-benefits than other scenarios.But all the mitigation measured set on carbon mitigation have better co-benefit potential on environment.For transportation sector which has large co-benefit potential,co-benefits should be integrated into policy evaluation to promote the most effective mitigation policies.
机译:中国的快速经济发展导致了对更好的空气质量和人类福利的需求。碳减缓和当地污染物减少措施之间的相互作用总是被忽视。本文提出了对运输部门的环境效应评估。基于中国时代模型,我们设计了四种情景描述了未来的能源策略:常用商业(BAU)情景,加快消除黄色标准汽车(EPM)情景,新技术推广和燃料经济性标准升级(TPS)情景和燃油税方案( FTAX).Results向我们展示EPM场景和TPS场景对于碳和本地污染物减少,均可持续减缓影响。EPM方案最为有助于利用运输结构。对于本地污染物的共同益处,结果表明EPM和FTAX情景具有比其他情况更好的共同效益。但所有在碳缓解上测量的缓解都具有更好的共同利益潜力在环境中。对于拥有大型合作潜力的运输部门,应纳入政策评估的共同效益,以促进最有效的缓解政策。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号