首页> 外文会议>IAEE International Conference >FORECASTING OIL PRICE VOLATILITY: THE ROLE OF MIXED-FREQUENCY-DATA (MIDAS) MODEL
【24h】

FORECASTING OIL PRICE VOLATILITY: THE ROLE OF MIXED-FREQUENCY-DATA (MIDAS) MODEL

机译:预测油价波动:混合频率数据(MIDAS)模型的作用

获取原文

摘要

The increase in crude oil price volatility observed particularly around the period of the global financial crisis has created new interest into how to improve volatility forecasts. It is of primary importance for energy researchers, firms, financial market participants and policy makers to have models available that can provide accurate forecasts of oil price volatility. Furthermore, in the literature, high oil price volatility periods have also caused new debate on the potential drivers ( Kilian and Murphy, 2014; Van Robays, I., 2016; Degiannakis and Filis, 2017). Comprehending oil price volatility determinants is also crucial due to the fact that oil price volatility by itself could have a negative impact on economic activity (Jo, 2014; Van Robays, I., 2016). At the same time, the literature has experienced increased emphasis on the link between oil and financial markets. The critical question for this new link is whether financial market information can assist in forecasting oil price volatility. Therefore, this paper focuses not only on forecasting oil price volatility but also its potential determinants in the context of when they are most likely to exert their predictive power. The study of Degiannakis and Filis (2017) is the first study to extract information from other markets to help improve oil price volatility forecasts. However, their study forecasts daily oil price volatility whereas this paper forecasts on a monthly basis. The rationale for this is that policy makers, firms and oil companies are more interested in the longer run forecasts and a wider range of oil benchmarks and, in consequence, this paper uses both Brent and WTI volatility. In more detail, this study investigates whether higher frequency (weekly) financial indices (both their volatilities and returns) help to improve the lower frequency (monthly) crude oil price realized volatility, using the MIDAS model. In this way, we assess whether there is useful predictive information for monthly oil price volatility in higher frequency data from financial markets. Using MIDAS models, we examine a large group of financial and economic variables which include either the returns and the volatilities of other asset class indices such as the Baltic Dry Index (proxy for global macroeconomic conditions), the Commodity Future Price Index (proxy for commodities market conditions), the MSCI World Index, the MSCI World Energy Index, S&P GSCI Index, S&P GSCI Energy Index (as proxies for global financial conditions), and Trade-weighted US exchange rate (proxy for global foreign exchange market).The use of these asset classes is motivated by Degiannakis and Filis (2017) who show that daily oil price volatility forecasts are improved when the information of asset volatilities that belong to these asset classes is incorporated to the forecasting models. Our data period is from January 3, 1995, to March 31, 2017. Thus, to forecast monthly oil price volatility, our initial sample size is 119 months and the last 148 months are used to evaluate the out-of-sample volatility forecasts. Since 2005/2006 onwards oil prices started to reach much higher price levels which would change the behaviour of volatility. Thus we ensure our out-of-sample covers this more turbulent period.
机译:原油价格波动的增加特别是在全球金融危机期间观察到,为如何改善波动性预测创造了新的利益。它对能源研究人员,公司,金融市场参与者和决策者具有主要重要性,以提供可提供的型号,可以提供准确的油价波动预测。此外,在文献中,高油价波动期也对潜在司机(Kilian和Murphy,2014; Van Robays,I.),2016; Degiannakis和Filis,2017)造成了新的辩论。理解石油价格波动决定簇也至关重要,因为石油价格波动本身可能对经济活动产生负面影响(JO,2014; van Rebays,I.,2016)。与此同时,文献经历了增加石油和金融市场之间的联系。这一新链接的关键问题是金融市场信息是否可以协助预测油价波动。因此,本文不仅关注预测油价波动,而且其潜在的决定因素在最有可能发挥预测力的情况下。对Degiannakis和Filis(2017)的研究是第一次提取其他市场信息,以帮助改善油价波动预测。但是,他们的研究预测了每日油价波动,而本文按月预测。对此的理由是,政策制定者,企业和石油公司对更长的运行预测和更广泛的石油基准更有兴趣,因此,本文使用布伦特和WTI波动性。更详细地,本研究调查了更高频率(每周)财务指标(其波动和返还)有助于提高使用MIDAS模型实现较低的频率(每月)原油价格实现波动。通过这种方式,我们评估金融市场上较高频率数据中每月油价波动的有用预测信息。使用MIDAS模型,我们研究了一大群财务和经济变量,包括其他资产类别指数(如波罗的人干指标(全球宏观经济条件的代理),商品未来价格指数(商品代理)的返回和波动市场条件),MSCI世界指数,MSCI世界能源指数,标准普尔GSCI指数,标准普尔GSCI能源指数(作为全球财务状况的代表),以及贸易加权美国汇率(全球外汇市场代理)。使用这些资产课程是由Degiannakis和Filis(2017)的推动,他们表明,当属于这些资产课程的资产挥发性的信息纳入预测模型时,将改善日常油价波动预测。我们的数据期限为1995年1月3日至2017年3月31日。因此,预测月油价格波动,我们的初始样品大小为119个月,过去148个月用于评估样品超出挥发性预测。自2005/2006年以来,原油价格开始达到更高的价格水平,这会改变波动的行为。因此,我们确保我们的样本涵盖了这种更动荡的时期。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号