首页> 外文会议>ESAFORM 2012 >A comparison between three meta-modeling optimization approaches to design a tube hydroforming process
【24h】

A comparison between three meta-modeling optimization approaches to design a tube hydroforming process

机译:三种元建模优化方法的比较设计管液压成形过程

获取原文

摘要

Computer aided procedures to design and optimize forming processes have become crucial research topics as the industrial interest in cost and time reduction has been increasing. A standalone numerical simulation approach could make the design too time consuming while meta-modeling techniques enables faster approximation of the investigated phenomena, reducing the simulation time. Many researchers are, nowadays, facing such research challenge by using various approaches. Response surface method (RSM) is probably the most known one, since its effectiveness was demonstrated in the past years. The effectiveness of RSM depends both on the definition of the Design of Experiments (DoE) and the accuracy of the function approximation. The number of numerical simulations can be strongly reduced if a proper optimization approach is implemented: one of the main issues about optimization techniques is related to the design necessity of performing either global or local approximation. This paper aims to test the efficacy of some meta-modeling techniques in the optimization of a T-shaped hydroforming process. In this paper three optimization approaches based on different meta-modeling techniques are implemented. In particular, classical Polynomial Regression approach (PR), Moving Least Squares approximation (MLS) and Kriging method are applied. The results showed that, thanks to the peculiarities of MLS and Kriging methods, it is possible to strongly reduce the computational effort in sheet metal forming optimization, particularly in comparison with a classical PR approach. Differences were highlighted and quantified.
机译:设计和优化成型过程的计算机辅助程序已成为关键的研究主题,因为对成本和时间的工业利益一直在增加。独立的数值模拟方法可以使设计过于耗时,而Meta建模技术能够更快地逼近调查现象,降低模拟时间。现在,许多研究人员通过使用各种方法面临这些研究挑战。响应面法(RSM)可能是最着名的方法,因为过去几年证实了其有效性。 RSM的有效性取决于实验设计的定义(DOE)和函数近似的准确性。如果实现了适当的优化方法:优化技术的主要问题之一是能够强烈降低数值模拟的数量与执行全局或局部近似的设计必要性有关。本文旨在测试一些元建模技术在优化T形液压成形过程中的功效。本文实施了基于不同元建模技术的三种优化方法。特别地,施加典型多项式回归方法(PR),移动最小二乘近似(MLS)和Kriging方法。结果表明,由于MLS和Kriging方法的特性,可以强烈地降低金属板形成优化中的计算工作,特别是与经典PR方法相比。突出显示和量化的差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号