首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Environmental Science and Technology >ELECTRO-REGENERATION OF Ce(IV) IN REAL SPENT Cr-ETCHING SOLUTIONS: COMPARISON OF SEPARATORS
【24h】

ELECTRO-REGENERATION OF Ce(IV) IN REAL SPENT Cr-ETCHING SOLUTIONS: COMPARISON OF SEPARATORS

机译:实际花费CR蚀刻解决方案中CE(IV)的电煅烧:分离器的比较

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Different separators (membranes) were investigated for the electro-regeneration of Ce(IV) from Ce(III) in real spent Cr-etching solutions. The experiments were performed at 2 A and 40°C in a divided cell using real spent Cr-etching solutions as the anolyte and 4 M HNO3 as the catholyte. The anode and cathode materials were platinum (2.25 cm~2) and titanium (1 cm~2), respectively. Among the tested separators (Neosepta CMX, Neosepta AMX, Nation 117, and Nafion 212), the CMX membrane had the best performance in terms of Ce(IV) yield and current efficiency for the electro-regeneration of Ce(IV); the greatest apparent rate constant for Ce(IV) electro-regeneration was 9.4×10~(-5) s~(-1) when using the CMX membrane. The Ce(IV) yield and current efficiency were more influenced by separator thickness than by separator selectivity to anions/cations.
机译:研究了不同的分离器(膜)在真正的CR蚀刻溶液中从CE(III)的Ce(IV)的电再生。使用真正的废物Cr蚀刻溶液在分开的电池中在2A和40℃下进行实验,作为阳极电解液和4M HNO3作为阴极电解液。阳极和阴极材料分别是铂(2.25cm〜2)和钛(1cm〜2)。在测试的分离器中(Neosepta CMX,Neosepta AMX,Nation 117和Nafion 212),CMX膜在Ce(IV)产量和Ce(IV)电再生的电流效率方面具有最佳性能;使用CMX膜时Ce(IV)电再生的最大明显的表观速率常数为9.4×10〜(-5)S〜(-1)。 CE(IV)产量和电流效率受到分离器厚度的影响,而不是通过分离器选择性到阴离子/阳离子。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号