'Smart growth and integrated planning in urban changes of Dublin and Gdansk' is a complex issue. Its complexity emerges from various factors that need to be considered. First, the urbanisation process in such different cities should be analysed separately because of differences in the planning systems and the context of governance. The next problem to be taken into account is the nature of the process itself. The discernible characteristics of the particular stage of urban changes in every particular city should be carefully examined and explained. Therefore, the first assumption was that there were some groups among cities that were similar in the character and stage of their urban changes (van den Berg 1982, Cheshire and Hay 1989, Cheshire 1995 and Champion 1995) and that this situation was common and applied to Gdansk as well. Gdansk is following a similar path of development as other European cities, although it can be at a different stage of its urban changes. Hence the objective of the first part of the research was to designate the relevant European city, adequate to be compared with Gdansk. A key difficulty here was to position Gdansk among the whole array of European cities due to the differences in advancement in their respective urban development. Finally, Dublin was chosen for the comparison.
展开▼
机译：“都柏林和格但斯克城市变迁”智能成长和综合规划是一个复杂的问题。它的复杂性从需要考虑的各种因素中出现。首先，由于规划系统和治理范围的差异，应分别分别分析如此不同城市的城市化进程。要考虑的下一个问题是过程本身的性质。应仔细检查和解释每个特定城市的城市变化特定阶段的特定阶段的特征。因此，第一次假设是，在其城市变化的特征和阶段存在一些群体（Van den Berg 1982，Cheshire和Hay 1989，Cheshire 1995，1995年），这种情况是普遍和应用的到格但斯克也是如此。格但斯克跟随与其他欧洲城市相似的发展道路，尽管它可以处于城市变革的不同阶段。因此，研究的第一部分是指定欧洲相关的城市，足以与格但斯克进行比较。这里的一个关键难度是由于各自城市发展进步的差异，这是欧洲各类城市中的格萨斯克。最后，都柏林被选为比较。
展开▼
