首页> 外文会议>IAHR Congress >Reconciliation between Flood Frequency Analysis and Rainfall-Runoff Model Results
【24h】

Reconciliation between Flood Frequency Analysis and Rainfall-Runoff Model Results

机译:洪水频率分析与降雨 - 径流模型的对帐

获取原文

摘要

This study investigates the effectiveness of flood frequency analysis as a tool for verification of hydrological models. The study methodology is based on a case study at seven catchments on the Gold Coast, Australia. The study contributes to the body of knowledge by highlighting a number of pitfalls that hinder achieving reconciliation between flood frequency and hydrological modelling results. These pitfalls appear to be mainly associated with uncertain data. Rainfall maps that are used as input in hydrological modelling can be an important source of discrepancy, if they are not up-to-date and adequately filtered with respect to sub-duration inconsistencies. Inaccuracy of rating curves at measurement stations, inappropriate initial and continuous loss parameters; inaccurate Areal Reduction Factor and disregarding non-linear response of catchments are other contributing factors. A mismatch between the length of data set that is used for the generation of rainfall maps and the length of the data set that is used for flood frequency analysis can also be a reason for discrepancy between model outputs and flood frequency analysis results.
机译:本研究调查了洪水频率分析作为验证水文模型的工具的有效性。研究方法基于澳大利亚黄金海岸的七个集水区的案例研究。该研究通过突出一些阻碍洪水频率和水文建模结果之间的和解的许多陷阱来贡献知识体系。这些陷阱似乎主要与不确定的数据有关。作为水文建模中的输入的降雨地图可以是差异的重要来源,如果它们不是最新的,并且相对于子持续时间不一致充分筛选。测量站的评级曲线不准确,不适当的初始和连续损失参数;不准确的面积减少因素和忽视集水区的非线性响应是其他贡献因素。用于生成降雨地图的数据集长度与用于洪水频率分析的数据集的长度之间的不匹配也可能是模型输出和洪水频率分析结果之间差异的原因。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号