首页> 外文会议>World Congress on In Vitro Fertilization >Ultrasound Guided Versus Blind Touch Embryo Transfer: The Egyptian Experience
【24h】

Ultrasound Guided Versus Blind Touch Embryo Transfer: The Egyptian Experience

机译:超声导向与盲触摸胚胎转移:埃及经验

获取原文

摘要

To study the effect of abdominal ultrasound-guided embryo transfer (USG-ET) vs. clinical touch embryo transfer (CT-ET) among Egyptian patients undergoing ICSI procedure on the pregnancy outcomes. Patients and Methods: 853 ICSI cycles were studied. 418 women had USG-ET and 435 had CT-ET. Chemical and clinical pregnancy and implantation rate were assessed. Also the incidence of ectopic pregnancy and miscarriage rate were estimated. Results: The clinical pregnancy was almost doubled by using the USG-ET (RR 1.96, 95 % CI =1.03 to 3.75, P<0.0001). Nevertheless, there were no significant differences in ectopic pregnancy or miscarriage rates between the two groups. Conclusions: Although patient's discomfort is slightly more while using USG-ET, this technique significantly improves the chances of achieving a successful pregnancy.
机译:研究腹部超声引导胚胎转移(USG-ET)与临床触摸胚胎转移(CT-et)在妊娠结算中进行ICSI程序中的临床触摸胚胎转移(CT-et)的影响。患者和方法:研究了853个ICSI循环。 418名女性usg-et和435有ct-et。评估化学和临床妊娠和植入率。估计异位妊娠和流产率的发生率。结果:使用USG-ET(RR 1.96,95%CI = 1.03至3.75,P <0.0001),临床妊娠几乎加倍。然而,两组之间的异位妊娠或流产率没有显着差异。结论:尽管使用USG-ET的患者的不适稍微稍微稍微,但这种技术显着提高了实现成功怀孕的机会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号