首页> 外文会议>International Seminar on Nuclear War and Planetary Emergencies >GAP ANALYSIS OF EU COUNTERTERRORISM RESEARCH INITIATIVES
【24h】

GAP ANALYSIS OF EU COUNTERTERRORISM RESEARCH INITIATIVES

机译:欧盟反恐研究举措的差距分析

获取原文

摘要

Some of the 27 Member States in the European Union (EU) had gained extensive experience individually in counterterrorism over decades in their fight against well organized groups. However, it required the terror attacks in the U.S. in 2001, in Madrid 2004 and in London 2005 to shape the EU's reaction and to initiate coordinated research activities in the 27 Member States. The current 7~(th) EU Framework Programme (FP7) has allocated ? 1,350 million for Security for the period 2007 to 2013. The key FP7 activities relate to restoring safety and security in case of crisis. The paper provides an analysis of 17 major EU counterterrorism research projects and reviews the U.S. approach to security for comparison. The following main gaps were identified in the implementation of the EU research initiatives: (1) diverse counterterrorism strategies between Member States; (2) insufficient consideration given to terrorism risk-assessment; (3) inadequate coordination/ cooperation between EU funded civil security research and similar research activities by the European Defence Agency (EDA) and European Space Agency (ESA); (4) dominance of EU defence industry over SMEs, universities and R&D organisations; (5) cumbersome bureaucracy in administrating research projects.
机译:欧洲联盟(欧盟)中的一些成员国中的一些国家在反对有组织群体的战斗中,在反恐中单独获得了丰富的经历。但是,它需要2001年美国2001年美国2004年和2005年伦敦的恐怖袭击,旨在塑造欧盟的反应,并在27个成员国启动协调研究活动。目前的7〜(Th)欧盟框架计划(FP7)已经分配? 2007年至2013年度的安全安全为13.5亿。关键的FP7活动与危机的恢复安全和安全有关。本文提供了对17个主要欧盟抵抗力研究项目的分析,并审查了美国的安全方法。在执行欧盟研究举措方面确定了以下主要差距:(1)会员国之间的不同反恐战略; (2)对恐怖主义风险评估的考虑不足; (3)欧盟之间的协调/合作不足,欧洲辩护机构(EDA)和欧洲航天局(ESA)的民事安全研究和类似研究活动; (4)欧盟国防产业的主导地位,跨中小企业,大学和研发组织; (5)管理研究项目的繁琐官僚机构。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号