首页> 外文会议>International Association of Theoretical and Applied Limnology >Do shallow-water macroinvertebrate assemblages correspond to physico-chemical habitats of streams and lakes?
【24h】

Do shallow-water macroinvertebrate assemblages correspond to physico-chemical habitats of streams and lakes?

机译:浅水浅水大型大型组装是否对应于溪流和湖泊的物理化学栖息地?

获取原文

摘要

Benthic macroinvertebrate fauna is a biological quality element required for classification of the biological status of waterbodies. Rivers, lakes, and transitional waters are outlined as separate categories for which different quality criteria must be applied (WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE 2000). Actually, hydro-morphological differences between lotic and lentic sites (as well as between permanent and temporary sites) are not always distinct. Streams may begin from lakes, or run through lakes. Between bogs, but also before entering lakes, lotic waters include lentic sections. On the other hand, large lakes may possess wave-zones with a fauna resembling that of rivers rather than that of lakes.Studies of lake macrozoobenthos have traditionally focused on the profundal or the sublittoral. However, to directly compare the macroinvertebrates of lakes, streams, and transitional waters, only shallow-water areas appear to be appropriate because only they occur in each category. The littoral as an area alternative to the profundal was recently recommended for classification of lakes (SOLIMINI et al. 2006). Similarly, stream margins serve as appropriate corresponding area, if water in the middle of channel is too deep (LINKE & NORRIS 2003).Comparison of the shallow-water macroinvertebrate assemblages of different waterbody types is still seldom performed. In the Netherlands, 42 cenotypes, based on macroinvertebrates, were separated from among a wide range of waterbodies (VERooNscHOr & NIJBOER 2000). In Sweden, habitat-scale and ecosystem characteristics explained best among-site variance both for streams and for lakes. No clear-cut functional differences were found between stream riffle communities and stony lake littoral communities (JOHNSON et al. 2004).We tested how well the macroinvertebrate assemblages of different (mostly permanent and unpolluted) habitats in shallow-water areas matched a priori established habitat types in Estonia, involving a wider range of biotopes than merely stony bottom. The study was intended to facilitate biological classification of waterbodies as required by the Directive.
机译:Benthic Macroinvertebreebrate Fauna是水资源同样的生物地位分类所需的生物质质量因素。河流,湖泊和过渡水域被概述为必须应用不同质量标准的单独类别(水框架指令2000)。实际上,荷花和熊熊型站点(以及永久性和临时站点之间)之间的水电态差异并不总是截然不同。溪流可以从湖泊开始,或者穿过湖泊。在沼泽之间,也在进入湖泊之前,豪爽的水域包括犹豫不决部分。另一方面,大湖泊可能拥有具有类似河流而不是湖泊的动物区的波浪区。宏Zoobenthos湖的研究传统上专注于流产或载体。然而,为了直接比较湖泊,溪流和过渡水域的大型脊椎动物,只有浅水区似乎是适当的,因为只有它们在每个类别中发生。最近推荐了作为Profuluder的替代品的漂亮区域,以便为湖泊进行分类(Solimini等,2006)。同样,流边距作为适当的相应区域,如果频道中间的水太深(Linke&Norris 2003)。浅水多脊椎动物组合的不同水体类型仍然很少进行。在荷兰,基于大型椎骨障碍物的42个腺型,与各种水平(Veroonschor&Nijboer 2000)分开。在瑞典,栖息地和生态系统特征在溪流和湖泊中解释了最佳现场方差。没有明确的功能差异,在流浅滩社区和石湖沿海社区之间发现了(2004年约翰逊湖)。我们测试了浅水区不同(主要是永久性和未受污染的)栖息地的大型近水域栖息地的含量匹配爱沙尼亚的栖息地类型,涉及更广泛的生物缺陷,而不是仅仅是石底。该研究旨在促进指令要求的水上曲线的生物学分类。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号