首页> 外文会议>IASTED international conference on artificial intelligence and applications >INFILLING MAXIMA ANNUAL MONTHLY FLOWS USING FEEDFORWARD BACKPROPAGATION (BP) ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS (ANNs)
【24h】

INFILLING MAXIMA ANNUAL MONTHLY FLOWS USING FEEDFORWARD BACKPROPAGATION (BP) ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS (ANNs)

机译:使用馈电反向衰减(BP)人工神经网络(ANNS)耗尽最大月度月的月度流量

获取原文

摘要

The standard backpropagation (BP) artificial neural network (ANNs) and the pseudo Mac Laurin power series order 1 (McLlBP) and order 2 (McL2BP) derivatives techniques are used to in-fill maxima annual monthly flows. The data infilling techniques (ANNs) are firstly compared using the Root Mean Square Error of Predictions (RMSEp) as criterion. Then ANNs are briefly compared to selected regression methods (RMs) using the same criterion. South African flow gauges (i.e. the Diepkloof (control) gauge and the Molteno (target) gauge of the Orange drainage river systems are used as a case study. Generally, the study demonstrated that the ANNs techniques performed almost at the same level when maximum annual monthly flows are used. The three techniques showed a relatively substantial impact on the accuracy of the estimated missing values at the Molteno gauge for missing data proportions beyond 10 %. ANNs were shown to perform slightly better than their RMs.
机译:标准BackPropagation(BP)人工神经网络(ANNS)和伪MAC LAURIN Power系列订单1(MCLLBP)和订单2(MCL2BP)衍生物技术用于填充最大月度月度流量。首先使用预测(RMSEP)作为标准的根均方误差进行比较数据缺陷技术(ANNS)。然后使用相同的标准将ANNS与所选回归方法(RMS)进行短暂的。南非流量表(即Diepkloof(控制)计和橙色排水河系统的莫尔托(靶)计量作为案例研究。一般而言,该研究表明,ANNS技术几乎在最大年度的级别处于同一水平进行使用每月流量。三种技术对MoleToG计的估计缺失值的准确性产生了相对显着的影响,以缺少10%的数据比例。ANNS被显示出比其RMS略微好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号