首页> 外文会议>Annual Frontiers in Education Conference Global Engineering >Work in progress - promoting conceptual understanding through effective peer discussions in large classes
【24h】

Work in progress - promoting conceptual understanding through effective peer discussions in large classes

机译:正在进行的工作 - 通过大班上的有效讨论促进概念理解

获取原文

摘要

Using Personal Response Systems (PRS) in large lecture classes has been suggested as one way to encourage the active involvement of students in this challenging pedagogical environment. Positive correlations between PRS use and course grades have been shown, but few have attempted to determine what components of the active learning are most effective. Some factors that may contribute to the positive correlation include: increased time in which students are actively applying concepts in class, increased exposure to the type of questions asked by a particular instructor, and peer discussion opportunities that often accompany PRS use. We are most interested in the latter factor, as we believe that knowledge construction is social and peer discussion is an effective technique to promote conceptual understanding. By studying peer discussions, we can gain information on how to structure these social interactions so they lead to the most conceptual understanding. We have initiated a study of peer discussions with an experienced PRS instructor. This instructor has included several classroom scenarios where students respond to a PRS question, discuss the question with a peer, and then vote again. We are tracking several characteristics of the peer team (gender, comfort level in discussing with peer, familiarity with peer, comfort level with material) and we will determine the effectiveness of these discussions by 1) correlating them with the number of correct PRS responses and 2) listening to the recorded discussions of five groups.
机译:在大型讲座课程中使用个人反应系统(PRS)被建议为鼓励学生积极参与这一具有挑战性的教学环境的一种方式。已经显示了PRS使用与课程等级之间的正相关,但很少有人试图确定主动学习的哪些组成部分最有效。可能导致正相关的一些因素包括:学生在课堂上积极应用概念的增加的时间,增加了特定教练所提出的问题类型,以及经常伴随公关使用的同行讨论机会。我们对后一种因素最感兴趣,正如我们认为知识建设是社会和同行讨论是促进概念理解的有效技术。通过研究同伴讨论,我们可以获得有关如何构建这些社交互动的信息,以便他们导致最概括的理解。我们已启动与经验丰富的PRS教练的同伴讨论的研究。这位教练包括几个课堂情景,学生回应PRS问题,与同行讨论问题,然后再次投票。我们正在跟踪同行团队的几个特征(性别,舒适程度与同行讨论,熟悉同行,舒适程度与材料),我们将确定这些讨论的有效性1)将它们与正确的PRS响应的数量相关联2)聆听录制的五组讨论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号