首页> 外文会议>System Dynamics Society International Conference >Reductionism, Holism and System Dynamics
【24h】

Reductionism, Holism and System Dynamics

机译:还原主义,全美和系统动态

获取原文

摘要

Being pragmatic about it this paper does not set out to produce any startling conclusions or bring about any paradigm shifts it seeks simply to produce a little clarification on an area of SD and ST that is sometimes taken for granted. As Sterman points out "all models are wrong" and there is no attempt here to preach perfection or the 'right' way to do things, Sterman (2000, p846). Further support comes from Towill "there is an undoubted 'art' side to building a system dynamics model because establishing the 'truth' requires creativity", Towill (1993a, p206).My conclusion is therefore that SD is not an holistic means of systems modelling except that it is partly and the other part of it is reductionist and the two are inseparable. A logical extension of this is that holism and reductionism are themselves inseparable other than as subjective viewpoints.I further conclude that ST is a purer holistic modelling technique than SD and by definition I am differentiating the two.I am also concluding that the fact that SD is not a purely holistic method of systems modelling is not a problem; selling it as if it were is.I hope that I have illustrated in a meaningful and straightforward way the necessity of truly understanding the fundamental nature of SD as a blended continuum of holism and reductionism. Due to the subjective nature of both concepts neither (label) description is likely to be satisfactory on its own to cover the entire scope of options for development within SD.This has been a somewhat abstract look at the debate between holism and reductionism, though with a practical message at its heart, and several other similar topics are available for further work in the same vein. We might for instance think of the mantra that 'reinforcing loops produce exponential behaviour' as worthy of examination as it appears to be incorrect in specific cases and therefore incorrect as a rule. This and several other concepts at the heart of SD would be well worth a re-examination.The message in any further work would be the same - get it right before we sell it or it will get returned as it has been in the past.
机译:作为务实的宗旨,本文没有出发,以产生任何惊人的结论或带来任何范式的转变,它只能在有时被视为理所当然的SD和ST领域产生一点澄清。由于斯特曼指出“所有型号是错误的”,并且没有尝试宣传完美或“正确”的方式,斯特曼(2000,P846)。进一步的支持来自Towill“有一个毫无疑问的”艺术“方面建立一个系统动态模型,因为建立”真相“需要创造力”,Towill(1993a,p206).my结论是SD不是系统的整体手段建模除了它是部分和它的另一部分是还原剂,两者是不可分割的。这是一个逻辑的延伸是,除了主观的观点外,他们自己是不可分割的。我进一步得出结论,ST是纯粹的整体建模技术,而不是定义,我也在区分这两个事实不是纯粹的整体方法的系统建模不是问题;卖它就像它一样。我希望我已经以有意义和直接的方式说明了真正了解SD的基本性,作为SD的基本性,作为全美和还原主义的混合轴。由于两种概念的主观性质既不是(标签)的描述可能是令人满意的,以涵盖SD内的发展方案的整个范围。这一点摘要了解全美和减速主义之间的辩论在其心脏的实用信息,以及其他几个类似主题可用于进一步在同一静脉中的进一步工作。例如,我们可能会想到“加强循环产生指数行为”的咒语,因为在特定情况下似乎不正确,因此通常不正确。这是SD核心的这个和其他几个概念将非常值得重新检查。在任何进一步的工作中的信息都会是相同的 - 在我们销售它之前才能达到它,或者它将在过去的情况下返回。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号