首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management >EXPERT AND GENERAL PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS OF RISKS: PERPLEX STUDY
【24h】

EXPERT AND GENERAL PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS OF RISKS: PERPLEX STUDY

机译:对风险的专家和一般公众看法:困惑研究

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

What are the differences in risk perception between the general public and the experts? The PERPLEX study considers two issues: the first compares the general publics' and experts' perceptions of 27 risks, and the second considers the experts' perception regarding their daily activities and risk knowledge. In late October 2004, a survey was conducted on a sample of 2000 people. Although the available studies are not generally based on methodological foundations sound enough to use for drawing robust conclusions, they nevertheless provide lines of research for conducting the PERPLEX study, the only French experiment in such a wide scope in terms of individuals questioned and the number of people involved. The Perplex study has two major aims: To compare the perception of risks by members of the general public and by people from agencies working in areas of risks. To test the awareness of experts and the level of uniformity in their responses to risk, depending on how much they are affected by their line of work, within their organisation, their involvement in a scientific project, their approval of their organisation's project or the nature of the risk that their organisation has to face directly or indirectly.
机译:公众与专家之间的风险感知差异是什么?困惑研究考虑了两个问题:第一次将一般公众和专家对27个风险的看法进行了比较,第二个是考虑专家对日常活动和风险知识的看法。 2004年10月下旬,在2000人的样本上进行了一项调查。虽然可用的研究通常不是基于方法论基础,但对于绘制强大的结论,但它们不允许为进行困扰研究提供研究线,这是唯一的法国实验在这种广泛的个人质疑和数量方面的唯一范围参与的人。困惑的研究有两个主要目标:比较一般公众成员以及在风险领域工作的机构的人们对风险的看法。测试专家的认识和统一程度的风险的统一程度,具体取决于他们在其组织内部的工作中的工作,他们参与科学项目,他们的组织项目或性质的批准他们的组织必须直接或间接地面对的风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号