首页> 外文会议>Annual conference of the Computational Fluid Dynamics Society of Canada >A Comparison between Kinetic Flux Vector Splitting and Flux Difference Splitting Methods in Solution of Euler Equations
【24h】

A Comparison between Kinetic Flux Vector Splitting and Flux Difference Splitting Methods in Solution of Euler Equations

机译:欧拉方程溶液中动力通量矢量分裂与磁通差分裂方法的比较

获取原文

摘要

This paper is proposed to compare the performances of deferent inviscid flux approximation methods in solution of two-dimensional Euler equations.The methods belong to two different group of flux splitting methods:flux difference splitting(FDS) methods and kinetic flux vector splitting(KFVS) method.Here Roe method and Osher method belonging to flux difference splitting(FDS)group have been employed and their Performances are compared with that of kinetic flux vector splitting method(KFVS).Roe and Osher methods are based on approximate solution of Riemann problem over computational cell surfaces while the KFVS has a quit different base.In KFVS inviscid fluxes are approximated based on the kinetic theory and correlation between Boltzmann equation and Euler equations.For comparison the performances of the above mentioned methods three different problems have been solved.The first problem is flow over a 10 degree compression-expansion ramp with Mach number of 2.0,the second one is a transonic flow with Mach number of 0.85 over a 4.2% circular bump in a duct and the third is supersonic flow with Mach number of 3.0 over a circular blunt slab.
机译:本文提出了在二维欧拉方程溶液中比较推迟函数助焊剂近似方法的性能。方法属于两种不同的通量分裂方法:助焊剂差分裂(FDS)方法和动力通量矢量分裂(KFV)方法。使用了属于助熔剂分裂(FDS)组的ROE法和OSHER方法,并将其性能与动力学通量载体分裂方法(KFV)进行比较。罗姆和OSHER方法基于RIEMANN问题的近似解计算单元表面而KFV具有退出不同的基础。在KFVS免疫基础上基于动力学理论和Boltzmann方程和欧拉方程之间的相关性近似。比较上述方法的性能已经解决了三种不同的问题。首先问题是通过10度的压缩 - 膨胀斜坡流动,Mach数量为2.0,第二个是转发IC流量在管道中的4.2%圆形凸块上的Mach数为0.85,第三个是在圆形钝板上用Mach数为3.0的超音速。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号