首页> 外文会议>12th annual conference of the CFD Society of Canada (CFD 2004) >A Comparison between Kinetic Flux Vector Splitting and Flux Difference Splitting Methods in Solution of Euler Equations
【24h】

A Comparison between Kinetic Flux Vector Splitting and Flux Difference Splitting Methods in Solution of Euler Equations

机译:欧拉方程解中动力学通量矢量分裂和通量差分裂方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This paper is proposed to compare the performances of deferent inviscid flux approximation methods in solution of two-dimensional Euler equations.The methods belong to two different group of flux splitting methods:flux difference splitting(FDS) methods and kinetic flux vector splitting(KFVS) method.Here Roe method and Osher method belonging to flux difference splitting(FDS)group have been employed and their Performances are compared with that of kinetic flux vector splitting method(KFVS).Roe and Osher methods are based on approximate solution of Riemann problem over computational cell surfaces while the KFVS has a quit different base.In KFVS inviscid fluxes are approximated based on the kinetic theory and correlation between Boltzmann equation and Euler equations.For comparison the performances of the above mentioned methods three different problems have been solved.The first problem is flow over a 10 degree compression-expansion ramp with Mach number of 2.0,the second one is a transonic flow with Mach number of 0.85 over a 4.2% circular bump in a duct and the third is supersonic flow with Mach number of 3.0 over a circular blunt slab.
机译:本文旨在比较二维二维Euler方程解中不同的无粘性通量近似方法的性能。这些方法属于两种不同的通量分裂方法组:磁通差分裂(FDS)方法和动磁通矢量分裂(KFVS)采用了Roe方法和Osher方法属于磁通差分裂(FDS)组,并将它们的性能与动磁通矢量分裂方法(KFVS)进行了比较。Roe和Osher方法基于Riemann问题的近似解在KFVS具有完全不同的基数的情况下计算单元表面。在KFVS中,基于动力学理论以及Boltzmann方程和Euler方程之间的相关性来近似无粘性通量。为比较上述方法的性能,解决了三个不同的问题。问题是在马赫数为2.0的10度压缩-膨胀斜坡上流动,第二个是跨子管道中4.2%的圆形凸点上的马赫数为0.85的ic流,而圆形钝板上的马赫数为3.0的超声速流。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号