首页> 外文会议>International Livestock Environment Symposium >Welfare, Meat Quality, and Performance of Pigs Housed in Large-Group, Deep-Litter Systems
【24h】

Welfare, Meat Quality, and Performance of Pigs Housed in Large-Group, Deep-Litter Systems

机译:福利,肉质和猪的猪,饲养在大型垃圾系统中的猪

获取原文

摘要

Producers and consumers perceive that group rearing of slaughter pigs in deep bedded hoop barns is more welfare-friendly for pigs and produces pork with more desirable eating quality compared to conventional systems. However, little research supportsthis perception. Our objectives in two separate experiments were to evaluate the effects of housing system on pig welfare, meat quality, growth of finishing pigs, and economic performance. In Experiment 1, treatments included pigs housed in a confinementbarn fed a diet based on corn and soybean meal (CCS); pigs housed in a hoop barn fed the same corn-soybean meal based diet sequence (1 ICS); and pigs housed in a hoop barn fed a diet based on alternative grains (barley, oats, buckwheat, field peas, andexpeller soybean meal; HAG). Daily gain was similar for pigs housed in the hoop barns compared to the confinement barn but HCS pigs consumed about 7% more feed (P < .05) than CCS pigs. Average daily gain and feed/gain were depressed (P < .03) by HAG compared with HCS. A trained sensory taste panel detected no differences in eating quality of loins harvested from pigs in this experiment. In Experiment 2, pigs were housed under the same conditions as Exp. 1 except that all pigs received corn-soybean mealbased diets. Focal pigs housed in hoop barns demonstrated more exploratory behaviors in a novel environment. Housing treatment had no effect on eating quality of pork. We conclude that hoop barns reduce efficiency of pig growth, and alter pig behavior but have no effect on quality of pork harvested.
机译:导致生产者和消费者认为,猪在床箍谷仓中的屠宰猪饲养更加福利,与常规系统相比,猪肉生产猪肉更令人满意的饮食品。但是,很少的研究支持。我们在两项独立实验中的目标是评估住房系统对养猪福利,肉质,整理猪的生长以及经济表现的影响。在实验1中,治疗包括猪饲养在喂养基于玉米和大豆膳食的饮食(CCS)的饲料;饲养在箍谷仓的猪喂养相同的基于玉米膳食的饮食序列(1 icic);和猪在箍谷仓里饲喂饮食,基于替代谷物(大麦,燕麦,荞麦,豌豆,安排豆粕; HAG)。与限制谷仓相比,在箍谷仓中饲养的猪,但HCS猪的猪比CCS猪消耗约7%的饲料,每日收益相似。与HCS相比,HAG抑制了平均每日增益和饲料/增益(p <.03)。训练有素的感官味道面板在本实验中检测到从猪收获的腰部的含水质量没有差异。在实验2中,猪在与EXP相同的条件下。 1除了所有猪都接受了玉米大豆米饭的饮食。在箍谷仓中坐落在篮子里的焦猪在新的环境中表现出更多的探索性行为。住房治疗对猪肉的质量没有影响。我们得出结论,箍谷仓降低了猪生长的效率,并改变猪行为,但对收获的猪肉质量没有影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号