首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Maintenance Dredging >Contract v in-house maintenance dredging
【24h】

Contract v in-house maintenance dredging

机译:合同V内部维修疏浚

获取原文

摘要

Maintenance dredging operations can form a significant proportion of a ports total ongoing operating costs and in some cases it is the highest single item of port expenditure. Like most decisions made by any commercial organisation the decision whether or not maintenance dredging should be undertaken by equipment owned, operated, manned and maintained directly by the port (referred to as 'in-house dredging') or by engaging specialist dredging contractors to undertake the task (referred to as 'contract dredging') is primarily an economic one, however there are other factors that should also be taken into consideration. Direct comparison between the benefits and disadvantages of in-house maintenance dredging and contract maintenance dredging to undertake what is essentially the same task is not always straightforward. The final decision can only be made after a thorough evaluation of all the factors involved and how these factors combine to produce the most economically advantageous solution for each situation.
机译:维护疏浚操作可以形成港口总持续运营成本的大量比例,并且在某些情况下它是最高的港口支出项目。就像任何商业组织所做的大多数决定一样,决定是否应由港口直接由港口(被称为“内部疏浚”)或者通过从事专家疏浚承包商承担的设备进行维护疏浚的决定任务(称为“合同疏浚”)主要是经济的,然而,还有其他因素也应考虑。在内部维护疏浚和合同维护的益处和缺点之间直接比较疏浚承担基本相同的任务并不总是直截了当。最终决定只能在彻底评估所涉及的所有因素以及这些因素结合如何为每种情况产生最具经济的有利解决方案之后进行。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号