首页> 外文会议>Conference on metrology, inspection, and process control for microlithography >Methods for Evaluating Lithographic Performance of Exposure Tools for the 45nm node: ECD and Scatterometry
【24h】

Methods for Evaluating Lithographic Performance of Exposure Tools for the 45nm node: ECD and Scatterometry

机译:用于评估45nm节点的曝光工具的光刻性能的方法:ECD和散射测定法

获取原文

摘要

This paper compares two metrology methodologies, ECD (Electrical CD) and SCD (Spectroscopic CD), for the 45nm-node-like gate level. Measurements were taken on both metrology tools, for different features, and the data was processed to reflect the exposure tool's fingerprint within the exposure field. ACLV (cross chip line-width variation) and through-focus measurements were also collected. There is a DC bias between the ECD and SCD. The cross slit and cross scan average plots are very similar between the two methods. The correlation between ECD and SCD gave R~2 of 0.95 and 0.92 for 220nm and 480nm pitches respectively. Results showed that SCD is a viable candidate to replace ECD for characterizing the exposure system for the 45nm node. Data also showed that there are fundamental differences between the two methods that cannot be attributed to random errors. These differences account for less than 1nm at 3 σ.
机译:本文比较了两个计量方法,ECD(电气CD)和SCD(光谱CD),用于45nm节点状栅极电平。在两个计量工具上拍摄测量,针对不同的特征,并且处理数据以反映曝光场内的曝光工具的指纹。还收集了ACLV(交叉芯片线宽变化)和通过聚焦测量。 ECD和SCD之间存在直流偏置。两种方法之间的交叉狭缝和交叉扫描平均图非常相似。 ECD和SCD之间的相关性分别给出了0.95和0.92的R〜2,分别为220nm和480nm间距。结果表明,SCD是一种可行的候选者,用于更换ECD,用于表征45nm节点的曝光系统。数据还表明,两种方法之间的差异是根本的差异,这些方法不能归因于随机错误。这些差异占3σ的小于1nm。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号