首页> 外文会议>IFAC symposium on system identification >A COMPARISON OF TWO METHODS FOR STOCHASTIC FAULT DETECTION: THE PARITY SPACE APPROACH AND PRINCIPAL COMPONENTS ANALYSIS
【24h】

A COMPARISON OF TWO METHODS FOR STOCHASTIC FAULT DETECTION: THE PARITY SPACE APPROACH AND PRINCIPAL COMPONENTS ANALYSIS

机译:两种用于随机故障检测方法的比较:奇偶校验空间方法和主要成分分析

获取原文

摘要

This paper reviews and compares two methods for fault detection and isolation in a stochastic setting, assuming additive faults on input and output signals and stochastic unmeasurable disturbances. The first method is the parity space approach, analyzed in a stochastic setting. This leads to Kalman filter like residual generators, but with a FIR filter rather than an IIR filter as for the Kalman filter. The second method is to use principal component analysis (PCA). The advantage is that no model or structural information about the dynamic system is needed, in contrast to the parity space approach. We explain how PCA works in terms of parity space relations. The methods are illustrated on a simulation model of an F-16 aircraft, where six different faults are considered. The result is that PCA has similar fault detection and isolation capabilities as the stochastic parity space approach.
机译:本文在随机定型中进行了两种故障检测和隔离方法,假设输入和输出信号和随机不可衡量的干扰上的附加故障。第一种方法是在随机设置中分析的奇偶校验空间方法。这导致卡尔曼滤波器如残留的发电机,但具有FIR滤波器而不是卡尔曼滤波器的IIR滤波器。第二种方法是使用主成分分析(PCA)。优点是与奇偶校验空间方法相比,不需要关于动态系统的模型或结构信息。我们解释了PCA如何在奇偶校验空间关系方面工作。该方法在F-16飞机的仿真模型上示出,其中考虑了六种不同的故障。结果是PCA具有类似的故障检测和隔离能力,作为随机奇偶校验空间方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号