首页> 外文会议>the International Peat Congress >Cutaway bog vs.Rural Environmental Protection Scheme - on cost benefit,could cutaway deliver more for biodiversity?
【24h】

Cutaway bog vs.Rural Environmental Protection Scheme - on cost benefit,could cutaway deliver more for biodiversity?

机译:Cutaway Bog VS.Rural环境保护计划 - 在成本效益,可削减削减为生物多样性提供更多?

获取原文

摘要

Introduced in 1994,The Rural Environmental Protection Scheme (REPS) has cost the Irish tax payer and the European Union billions of Euro - but has it delivered a cost benefit for biodiversity,or have we overlooked the potential of industrial cutaway bog to deliver more for biodiversity at a fraction of the cost? The National Biodiversity Plan sets out a number of key objectives including the conservation of species diversity,the conservation of all sites of biodiversity importance and to advancing other obligations of the Convention on Biological Diversity in the EU,regionally and internationally.In the forthcoming REPS 4 scheme,the average farmer in Ireland will receive a payment of ?7,220 per year until 2013.Based on the number of farmers predicted to join the REPS 4scheme,this equates to ?400 million per year,and by the end of 2013 the final cost to the exchequer will be ?1.6 billion.What would a tiny fraction of this money do for biodiversity if it were directed to habitat creation on cutaway? The dynamic nature of cutaway lends itself to exploitation for enhancing biodiversity.Others see cutaway bog as an opportunity to reduce Ireland's dependence on fossil fuel by using exhausted peatland for the production of bio-fuels.Grey Partridge (Perdix perdix) and Lapwing (Vanellus vanellus) are both Red Listed species in Ireland.Historically both of these species were associated with traditional farmland.In more recent times however,these birds have retreated to the cutaway bog because agricultural landscapes can no longer support breeding populations.Lough Boora Parklands has subsequently become a nationally important site for breeding Lapwing.Similarly,Hen Harrier (Circus cyaneus),an Annex I species of the EU Birds Directive,also exploit the cutaway managed for Grey Partridge at Boora in the Irish midlands.In this paper I will explore the potential of cutaway bog compared to that of REPS to enhance Irish national biodiversity and deliver a bonus for wildlife at a fraction of the cost to the exchequer.
机译:推出于1994年,农村环境保护计划(REPS)已经花费了爱尔兰纳税人和欧盟数十亿欧元的 - 但它提供一个成本效益的生物多样性,或者我们忽略了工业剖沼泽的潜力提供更多生物多样性在成本的一小部分?国家生物多样性计划提出了一些包括保护物种多样性,生物多样性重要性的所有遗址的保护关键目标,并在欧盟推进生物多样性公约的其他义务,区域和internationally.In即将REPS 4方案中,爱尔兰的普通农民将获得支付的每年?7,220至2013.Based农民预测加入REPS的数量4scheme,这相当于400?每年百万,并在2013年最终成本到底到国库会是什么?1.6 billion.What将这笔钱的一小部分为生物多样性做,如果它被定向到栖息地创作上剖?剖面的动态特性适合于开发提高biodiversity.Others见剖沼泽为契机,用疲惫的泥炭地用于生产生物fuels.Grey帕特里奇(Perdix perdix)和麦鸡的(学名:Vanellus学名:Vanellus降低爱尔兰对化石燃料的依赖)将在这两个物种中都与传统farmland.In更近的时候但是,这些鸟已经退到了剖沼泽,因为农业景观不再支持养殖populations.Lough Boora的Parklands随之成为相关联Ireland.Historically两个红色清单上的物种一个养殖Lapwing.Similarly,白尾鹞(马戏团cyaneus),欧盟鸟类指令附录I物种,还利用在爱尔兰midlands.In为灰山鹑在Boora管理本文中,我将探讨潜在的缺欠国家重要网站剖的沼泽相比REPS,以提高爱尔兰国家生物多样性和的一小部分提供奖金野生动物费用是国库。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号