【24h】

Models for Modular Neural Networks: A Comparison Study

机译:模块化神经网络的模型:比较研究

获取原文

摘要

There are mainly two approaches for machine learning: symbolic and sub-symbolic. Decision tree is a typical model for symbolic learning, and neural network is a model for sub-symbolic learning. For pattern recognition, decision trees are more efficient than neural networks for two reasons. First, the computations in making decisions are simpler. Second, important features can be selected automatically during the design process. This paper introduces models for modular neural network that are a neural network tree where each node being an expert neural network and modular neural architecture where interconnections between modules are reduced. In this paper, we will study adaptation processes of neural network trees, modular neural network and conventional neural network. Then, we will compare all these adaptation processes during experimental work with the Fisher's Iris data set that is the bench test database from the area of machine learning. Experimental results with a recognition problem show that both models (e.g. neural network tree and modular neural network) have better adaptation results than conventional multilayer neural network architecture but the time complexity for trained neural network trees increases exponentially with the number of inputs.
机译:主要有两种机器学习方法:符号和亚象征性。决策树是象征学习的典型模型,神经网络是子象征学习的模型。对于模式识别,由于两个原因,决策树比神经网络更有效。首先,制定决策的计算更简单。其次,在设计过程中可以自动选择重要特征。本文介绍了模块化神经网络的模型,该模型是神经网络树,其中每个节点是专家神经网络和模块化神经结构,其中模块之间的互连减小。在本文中,我们将研究神经网络树,模块化神经网络和传统神经网络的适应过程。然后,我们将在实验工作期间与Fisher的虹膜数据集进行比较所有这些适应过程,这是来自机器学习领域的台式测试数据库。具有识别问题的实验结果表明,两种模型(例如神经网络树和模块化神经网络)具有比传统的多层神经网络架构更好的适应结果,但是训练有素的神经网络树的时间复杂性随着输入的数量呈指数呈指数级增长。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号