首页> 外文会议>International Modal Analysis Conference >COMPARISON OF MODAL ANALYSIS MEASUREMENTS WITH MICROPHONE AND ACCELEROMETER ON HAMMER-IMPACTED STRUCTURES
【24h】

COMPARISON OF MODAL ANALYSIS MEASUREMENTS WITH MICROPHONE AND ACCELEROMETER ON HAMMER-IMPACTED STRUCTURES

机译:麦克风和加速度计对锤击结构的模态分析测量的比较

获取原文

摘要

Very light structures such as string instruments (violin, viola, cello) bridges are significantly mass-loaded with even the lowest mass accelerometers. On structures where the accelerometer mass is greater than 10% of the total mass of the structure, not only are the mode frequencies significantly changed, but the mode shapes can be strongly affected. Use of a microphone as a "no load" alternative to an accelerometer is an obvious - but not straightforward - solution to the mass loading problem. To determine in practice the applicability of microphone measurements for modal analysis, microphone and accelerometer transfer functions at a common driving point under identical conditions were measured for hammer-impact excitation on various freely suspended shapes, including a cylindrical aluminum (Al) bar, a flat rectangular wood plate, a flat aluminum rectangular plate, and a cello bridge. Considerable agreement between accelerometer and microphone measurements was found for mode frequencies and dampings, although some amplitudes were (relatively) quite different. Comparative results between the two methods will be presented.
机译:非常轻的结构,如串仪器(小提琴,Viola,Cello)桥梁,甚至是最低质量加速度计的显着大量批量装载。在加速度计质量大于结构总质量的10%的结构上,不仅模式频率明显变化,而且模式形状可能会受到强烈影响。使用麦克风作为加速度计的“无负载”替代方案是显而易见的,但不是直接的 - 对大众装载问题的解决方案。为了确定实际在实践中,在相同的条件下,在相同的条件下,在各种自由悬挂的形状下测量麦克风测量的麦克风测量,麦克风和加速度计转移功能在相同的条件下,包括圆柱形铝(Al)棒,平坦矩形木板,扁平铝矩形板和大提琴桥。发现了加速度计和麦克风测量之间的相当大的一致性的模式频率和阻尼,虽然一些幅度(相对)完全不同。将呈现两种方法之间的比较结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号