首页> 外文会议>Asia-Pacific Bioinformatics Conference >Inference of domain-disease associations from domain-protein, protein-disease and disease-disease relationships
【24h】

Inference of domain-disease associations from domain-protein, protein-disease and disease-disease relationships

机译:来自域蛋白,蛋白质疾病和疾病关系的区域疾病关联的推理

获取原文

摘要

Background: Protein domains can be viewed as portable units of biological function that defines the functional properties of proteins. Therefore, if a protein is associated with a disease, protein domains might also be associated and define disease endophenotypes. However, knowledge about such domain-disease relationships is rarely available. Thus, identification of domains associated with human diseases would greatly improve our understandingof the mechanism of human complex diseases and further improve the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of these diseases.Methods: Based on phenotypic similarities among diseases, we first group diseases into overlapping modules. We then develop a framework to infer associations between domains and diseases through known relationships between diseases and modules, domains and proteins, as well as proteins and disease modules. Different methods including Association, Maximum likelihood estimation (MLE), Domain-disease pair exclusion analysis (DPEA), Bayesian, and Parsimonious explanation (PE) approaches are developed to predict domain-disease associations.Results: We demonstrate the effectiveness of all the five approaches via a series of validation experiments, and show the robustness of the MLE, Bayesian and PE approaches to the involved parameters. We also study the effects of disease modularization ininferring novel domain-disease associations. Through validation, the AUC (Area Under the operating characteristic Curve) scores for Bayesian, MLE, DPEA, PE, and Association approaches are 0.86,0.84, 0.83, 0.83 and 0.79, respectively, indicating the usefulness of these approaches for predicting domain-disease relationships. Finally, we choose the Bayesian approach to infer domains associated with two common diseases, Crohn's disease and type 2 diabetes.Conclusions: The Bayesian approach has the best performance for the inference of domain-disease relationships. The predicted landscape between domains and diseases provides a more detailed view about the disease mechanisms.
机译:背景:蛋白质结构域可以被视为生物功能的便携式单元,其定义蛋白质的功能性质。因此,如果蛋白质与疾病有关,则蛋白质结构域也可能与疾病的内蛋白型相关。然而,关于这种结构症关系的知识很少可用。因此,鉴定与人类疾病相关的结构域将大大提高人体复杂疾病机制的理解,进一步改善这些疾病的预防,诊断和治疗。然后,我们通过已知的疾病和模块,域和蛋白质,蛋白质和蛋白质,以及蛋白质和疾病模块来制定一个框架,以通过已知的关系,以及蛋白质和疾病模块之间的已知关系来推断域和疾病之间的关联。包括协会,最大似然估计(MLE),区域疾病对排除分析(DPEA),贝叶斯和解析解释(PE)方法的不同方法是为了预测区域疾病协会。结果:我们证明了所有五个的有效性通过一系列验证实验方法,并展示了MLE,贝叶斯和PE接近涉及参数的鲁棒性。我们还研究了疾病模块化在进一步的新型域疾病协会的影响。通过验证,贝叶斯,MLE,DPEA,PE和关联方法的AUC(操作特征曲线下的区域)分数分别为0.86,0.84,0.83,0.83和0.79,表明这些方法预测结构症方法的有用性关系。最后,我们选择贝叶斯方法来推断与两种常见疾病,克罗恩病和2型糖尿病相关的域。结论:贝叶斯方法具有最佳性能,这对结构性疾病关系的推动。域和疾病之间的预测景观提供了关于疾病机制的更详细的观点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号