首页> 外文会议>European Conference on Non-Destructive Testing >Trusts and Beliefs in UT of Girth Welds
【24h】

Trusts and Beliefs in UT of Girth Welds

机译:围绕焊缝的信任和信仰

获取原文

摘要

In the German pipeline industry ultrasonic testing (UT) has been and still is the method favoured over radiographic testing (RT) for the inspection of girth welds. However, in the internationally widely applied Standard API 1104 (Welding of Pipelines and Related Facilities) till the nineteenth edition, September 1999, UT was of secondary importance when compared to RT. The NDT requirements in API 1104 are contrary to the NDT requirements in API 5L (Line Pipes), which are applied in pipe mills for the longitudinal and spiral welds, specifically for the continuous and uninterrupted inspection of welds by ultrasonic means (Automatic respectively mechanized UT). Common line pipe specifications like API 5L and EN 10208 (Steel Pipes for pipe lines for combustible fluids) include clear definitions about the reference standards used and define clearly the acceptance criteria for the applied ultrasonic inspection. As long as the NDT of girth welds is based on European Standards, the testing parameters including reference criteria and acceptance criteria for the ultrasonic inspection are also clearly defined. Depending on the quality requirements of the pipeline girth welds, a quality level, a testing class and an acceptance level are to be specified and on that basis reliable and reproducible UT results can be maintained. If UT is to be applied in accordance with API 1104 a qualification of the testing procedure is required prior to application. Basis for the acceptance of UT is the capability of the UT technique to circumferentially and axially locate imperfections, size for length, determine the distance between pipe surface and the imperfection and to compare the results with RT on defects and acceptable imperfections. In addition, the UT procedure must accurately determine the acceptability of welds based on the imperfection type, length and distribution, as cracks, linear surface, linear buried, transverse, volumetric cluster, volumetric individual, volumetric root and aggregate lengths. Many papers and inspection procedures reflect much belief in the UT capabilities to determine imperfection types and to locate and to size imperfections. From comparison reports on purposely made weld imperfections and from SGS in-house research work it can be shown to what extent UT results are trustable when inspecting girth welds in pipes made from thermo mechanically rolled plates.
机译:在德国管道行业超声波检测(UT),仍然是对胶束焊缝检查的射线照相检测(RT)赞成的方法。但是,在国际广泛应用的标准API 1104(管道和相关设施的焊接)到1999年9月9月的第十九版,与RT相比,UT是次要的。 API 1104中的NDT要求与API 5L(管线管)中的NDT要求相反,其在管铣刀中应用于纵向和螺旋焊缝,专门用于通过超声装置连续和不间断地检查焊缝(自动分别机械化UM) )。公共线管规格如API 5L和EN 10208(可燃液管线的钢管)包括关于所使用的参考标准的明确定义,并清楚地定义了应用超声检查的验收标准。只要围绕焊缝的NDT都是基于欧洲标准,也明确了包括超声检查的参考标准和验收标准的测试参数。根据管道周长焊接的质量要求,要指定质量水平,测试等级和验收水平,并且可以维护可靠和可重复的UT结果。如果要根据API 1104应用UT,则在应用程序之前需要测试过程的资格。接受UT的基础是UT技术的能力,围绕透露和轴向地定位缺陷,长度尺寸,确定管道表面和缺陷之间的距离,并将结果与​​室温进行比较,并使用室温进行缺陷和可接受的缺陷。此外,UT程序必须基于缺陷类型,长度和分布,作为裂缝,线性表面,线性埋地,横向,体积集群,体积个体,体积根和聚集长度的焊缝的可接受性。许多论文和检验程序反映了UT功能的信念,以确定缺陷类型和定位和尺寸不完美。从比较报告开始焊接缺陷缺陷和SGS内部研究工作,可以在检查由Thermo机械轧制板制成的管道中的围绕焊缝时,在多大程度上可信赖。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号