首页> 外文会议>Frontiers in Education Annual Conference >Cross-checking and good scores go together: students shrug
【24h】

Cross-checking and good scores go together: students shrug

机译:交叉检查和良好的分数在一起:学生耸耸肩

获取原文

摘要

Students can acquire greater confidence in their work by cross-checking their answers, but it seems that they seldom do so. Based on the premise that engineering instructors can and should be training students to acquire this skill as a habit, this paper reports on a one-semester experiment designed to provide substantial motivation for cross-checking and to measure how frequently students did so. In addition, evidence was gathered that establishes a positive correlation between good scores and cross-checking. Alas, despite continued emphasis throughout the term and updates on the correlation between cross-checking and good scores, the number of students who attempted to check their work remained remarkably low throughout the semester. Our results establish that time pressure is not a dominant reason that students do not check their answers. Implications of this puzzling resistance to (or apathy towards) cross-checking, possible reasons for it, and suggestions for combating it are discussed.
机译:学生可以通过交叉检查他们的答案来获得对工作的更大信心,但似乎他们很少这样做。基于工程教练的前提,应该是培训学生作为一种习惯来获取这项技能,这篇论文报告了一个学期的实验,旨在为交叉检查提供了大量的动机,并测量学生所做的频率。此外,收集了证据,这在良好分数与交叉检查之间建立了正相关性。尽管持续强调了整个期限并更新了交叉检查和良好分数之间的相关性,但试图检查其工作的学生人数在整个学期中都很低。我们的结果确定时间压力不是一个主导原因,即学生不检查他们的答案。讨论了这种令人费解的抗性对(或冷漠)交叉检查的可能原因以及对抗它的建议的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号