首页> 外文会议>Frontiers in Education Conference, 2001. 31st Annual >Cross-checking and good scores go together: students shrug
【24h】

Cross-checking and good scores go together: students shrug

机译:交叉核对和好成绩并存:学生耸耸肩

获取原文

摘要

Students can acquire greater confidence in their work by cross-checking their answers, but it seems that they seldom do so. Based on the premise that engineering instructors can and should be training students to acquire this skill as a habit, this paper reports on a one-semester experiment designed to provide substantial motivation for cross-checking and to measure how frequently students did so. In addition, evidence was gathered that establishes a positive correlation between good scores and crosschecking. Alas, despite continued emphasis throughout the term and updates on the correlation between cross-checking and good scores, the number of students who attempted to check their work remained remarkably low throughout the semester. The authors' results establish that time pressure is not a dominant reason that students do not check their answers. Implications of this puzzling resistance to (or apathy towards) cross-checking, possible reasons for it, and suggestions for combating it are discussed.
机译:通过交叉核对答案,学生可以获得对工作的更大信心,但似乎很少这样做。基于工程指导者可以并且应该训练学生以习得这种技能的前提,本文报告了一个学期的实验,该实验旨在为交叉核对提供实质性动机,并衡量学生进行核对的频率。此外,还收集了在良好分数和交叉核对之间建立正相关的证据。遗憾的是,尽管整个学期一直在强调重点,并且不断更新交叉检查与好成绩之间的相关性,但整个学期试图检查其工作的学生人数仍然非常低。作者的结果表明,时间压力并不是学生不检查答案的主要原因。讨论了这种对交叉检查(或对交叉检查无动于衷)的令人困惑的含义,可能的原因以及打击交叉检查的建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号