首页> 外文会议>MRS Meeting >Assessment of microscale test methods of peeling and splitting along surface of thin-film/substrates
【24h】

Assessment of microscale test methods of peeling and splitting along surface of thin-film/substrates

机译:薄膜/基板表面剥离和分裂微观试验方法的评估

获取原文

摘要

Peel test methods are assessed through being applied to a peeling analysis of the ductile film/ceramic substrate system. Through computing the fracture work of the system using the either beam bend model (BB model) or the general plane analysis model (GPA model), surprisingly, a big difference between both model results is found. Although the BB model can capture the plastic dissipation phenomenon for the ductile film case as the GPA model can, it is much sensitive to the choice of the peeling criterion parameters, and it overestimates the plastic bending effect unable to capture crack tip constraint plasticity. In view of the difficulty of measuring interfacial toughness using peel test method when film is the ductile material, a new test method, split test, is recommended and analyzed using the GPA model. The prediction is applied to a wedge-loaded experiment for Al-alloy double-cantilever beam in literature.
机译:通过应用于延性薄膜/陶瓷衬底系统的剥离分析来评估剥离试验方法。通过计算系统的裂缝工作,使用光束弯曲型号(BB模型)或通用平面分析模型(GPA模型),令人惊讶的是,发现两个模型结果之间的差异很大。尽管BB模型可以捕获延展性薄膜壳的塑料耗散现象作为GPA模型可以,但对剥离标准参数的选择非常敏感,并且它高估了不能捕获裂缝尖端约束可塑性的塑料弯曲效果。鉴于使用剥离试验法测量界面韧性的难度,当薄膜是延性材料时,建议使用GPA模型进行新的测试方法,分离试验。该预测应用于文献中的Al合金双悬臂梁的楔形水实验。

著录项

  • 来源
    《MRS Meeting 》|2002年||共6页
  • 会议地点
  • 作者

    Y. Wei;

  • 作者单位
  • 会议组织
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类 TB3-53;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号