首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Information and Communications Security >Experimental Comparisons of Verifiable Delay Functions
【24h】

Experimental Comparisons of Verifiable Delay Functions

机译:可验证延迟功能的实验比较

获取原文

摘要

Verifiable delay function (VDF) has been a hot topic in recent cryptography research since the Ethereum researchers announced that they intended to use it in Ethereum 2.0. VDF has many applications in decentralized systems. This paper tries to organize the development path of VDF and related applications. We compare the performance of the four state-of-art VDFs by theoretical analysis and experimental verification. And through experiments, the influence of different type of groups and different hardware conditions on VDF performance are compared. In the end, we concluded that Wesolowski VDF is more suitable for decentralized clock applications that require higher time accuracy. Meanwhile, modular N multiplicative cyclic group is more suitable for constructing VDF that requires higher time accuracy while the class group is more suitable for applications with limited space. Besides, the effect of hardware on various VDFs is basically the same if the four VDFs use the same group and in the case of the same number of evaluation steps. Generally speaking, it might have a constant multiple improvement on the performance of VDF.
机译:自我研究人员宣布他们打算在Ethereum 2.0中将其使用,可验证延迟函数(VDF)是最近的加密研究中的热门话题。 VDF在分散系统中有许多应用。本文试图组织VDF及相关申请的开发路径。通过理论分析和实验验证,我们比较四种最先进的VDFS的性能。并通过实验,比较了不同类型的组和不同硬件条件对VDF性能的影响。最后,我们得出结论,Wesolowski VDF更适合需要更高时间准确性的分散的时钟应用。同时,模块化N乘法循环组更适合构建需要更高时间精度的VDF,而类组更适合具有有限空间的应用。此外,如果四个VDF使用相同的组,并且在相同数量的评估步骤的情况下,则硬件对各种VDF的影响基本相同。一般来说,它可能会对VDF的性能产生恒定的多项改进。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号