首页> 外文会议>Annual Convention of the American Association of Equine Practitioners >Medical Versus Surgical Treatment of Ileal Impaction in Horses: A Retrospective Evaluation of 245 Cases
【24h】

Medical Versus Surgical Treatment of Ileal Impaction in Horses: A Retrospective Evaluation of 245 Cases

机译:医学与马匹难以撞击的手术治疗:回顾性评估245例

获取原文

摘要

The most common site for intraluminal impaction of the small intestine in horses is the ileum. Although ileal impactions in horses have been treated successfully by both medical and surgical treatment, the decision to continue with aggressive medicaltherapy or yield to surgical intervention may be difficult. The objective of this study was to identify clinical parameters that would assist the clinician in determining the probability of a successful outcome with medical management versus the need forsurgical intervention. Our hypothesis was that horses with ileal impaction that received aggressive medical therapy, did not produce significant amounts of nasogastric reflux, and were responsive to analgesic therapy would respond favorably to medical management, whereas horseswith persistent abdominal pain and positive nasogastric reflux would require surgical intervention.
机译:用于马匹内小肠的腔内剥夺最常见的位点是回肠。尽管在医疗和手术治疗中,马匹中的髂骨浸润物已经成功治疗,但是难以进行侵袭性医疗或对外科手术的屈服疗法的决定。本研究的目的是识别将协助临床医生确定在确定具有医学管理的成功结果的可能性与需要进行前言干预的临床参数。我们的假设是患有肠梗阻的马匹,接受侵略性的医疗疗法,并没有产生大量的鼻胃反流,并且对镇痛治疗响应会对医学管理有利反应,而马匹患有腹痛和阳性鼻咽血反应需要手术干预。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号