首页> 外文会议>Mechanisms and Robotics Biennial Conference >A comparative study on some different methods for complete balancing of shaking force and moment of linkages using force counterweights and inertia counterweights
【24h】

A comparative study on some different methods for complete balancing of shaking force and moment of linkages using force counterweights and inertia counterweights

机译:一种不同方法的对比研究,用力配重和惯性配重完全平衡摇曳力和键矩阵的矩

获取原文

摘要

A systematical comparative study of some methods for complete force and moment balance is presented in this paper, such as, the linearly independent vectors method, the mass-moment substitution method, the complex mass substitution method and a numerical method by a few kinematic positions for force balance; the quasi-linearly independent vectors method and the momentum-moment substitution method for complete moment balance. Their fundamental principles and characteristics are described and their relative merits and some limitations are discussed. This comparative study shows. (1) for complete force balance, the linearly independent vectors method and the mass-moment substitution method are two systematical methods. Relatively, the latter has two merits: i) according to the derived formula, the force balance conditions can be written down directly instead of extracting them from kinematic equations of a linkage, and derivation of the formula is rather simple; ii)there need not to introduce the complex masses and to determine their loci. (2) for complete moment balance, the momentum-moment substitution method is a systematical theory and there are two merits: i)according to die derived formula, the moment balance conditions can be written down directly instead of extracting them from kinematic equations of the linkage; ii)the basic idea of this method is the same as of the mass-moment substitution method. Perhaps, the mass-moment and momentum-moment substitution method is a systematical and practical theory for complete force and moment balance of planar and spatial linkages.
机译:本文提出了一种完全力和时刻平衡的一些方法的系统对比研究,例如线性独立的矢量方法,块状替代方法,复质替代方法和数值方法通过几个运动位置力平衡;准线性独立的矢量方法与全动力替代方法,实现完整的时刻平衡。描述了他们的基本原则和特征,并讨论了它们的相对优点和一些限制。这个比较的研究表明。 (1)对于完全力平衡,线性独立的载体方法和块状替代方法是两种系统方法。相对而言,后者具有两个优点:i)根据衍生公式,力平衡条件可以直接写入,而不是从链接的运动方程中提取它们,并且公式的衍生是相当简单的; ii)不需要介绍复杂的群众并确定其基因座。 (2)对于完整的时刻平衡,动量时代替代方法是一个系统理论,有两个优点:i)根据模具衍生公式,可以直接写下时刻平衡条件,而不是从运动方程中提取它们连锁; ii)该方法的基本思想与大规模替代方法相同。也许,群众时刻和动量时代的替代方法是完全力和平面的平衡和空间联系的时代平衡的系统和实用理论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号