【24h】

Legitimate Rights for Privacy--What Policies Are Necessary?

机译:隐私的合法权利 - 有必要的政策?

获取原文

摘要

In a widely publicized move to mend "moral hazards of the affluent few," the Korean tax authorities recently announced that they would investigate some 150 wealthy Koreans suspected of having evaded taxes among those who owned luxury foreign cars, had made more than 30 overseas golf tours during the previous years, and filed little or no income at all. Quite expectedly, the public reaction to the government move was overwhelmingly applause. What the public failed to see in that episode, however, was the process by which the 150 people had been singled out and its privacy implications. Apparently, the list was drawn bychecking state automobile registration records and customs records against tax records for the purpose of locating individuals who owned expensive cars and frequently traveled abroad with their golf clubs, but reported small incomes. In a country like Korea, such a computer matching can only be a painless routine, because every citizen, 17 years of age and older, has to submit a resident registration number in the conduct of every day-to-day business, the records of which are kept in large databases, and these databases with unrelated purposes are cross-checked for consistency by means of the individual ID number.
机译:在广泛的宣传举动中,韩国税务机关宣布韩国税务机构最近宣布,他们将调查约有150名富裕的韩国人在拥有奢侈品外国汽车的人之间逃税,已经超过30个海外高尔夫球前几年的旅游,并提出了很少或没有收入。相当希望,公众对政府举措的反应绝大多妙地掌声。然而,在这一集中,公众未能看到的是150人被挑选的过程以及其隐私含义的过程。显然,该清单是通过检查国家汽车登记记录和海关记录的税务记录,以定位拥有昂贵的汽车并经常与高尔夫俱乐部出国旅行的个人,但报告了小额收入。在像韩国这样的国家,这样的电脑匹配只能是一个无痛的例程,因为每个公民,17岁及以上,必须在每天到日常业务中提交常驻登记号码,记录保存在大型数据库中,并且这些数据库具有不相关的目的的数据库通过单个ID号码交叉检查。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号