首页> 外文会议>Leeds-Lyon Symposium on Tribology >Some fundamental differences in the adhesion and friction of rough versus smooth surfaces
【24h】

Some fundamental differences in the adhesion and friction of rough versus smooth surfaces

机译:粗糙度与光滑表面的粘附和摩擦的一些根本差异

获取原文

摘要

Recent Surface Forces Apparatus (SFA) experiments have shed new light on the roles of surface roughness and surface deformations, both at the molecular and microscopic scales, in determining adhesion and friction. Depending on the roughness, but also on other factors such as the stiffness and viscoelasticity of surfaces, these effects can cause the effective adhesion force to be orders of magnitude lower or higher than the thermodynamic (equilibrium) value, which in turn determines the frictional behaviour. The interactions of 'ideal', i.e., molecularly smooth, undamaged, surfaces are now quite well understood, both theoretically and experimentally. However, this is not the case for rough surfaces, which are difficult to define and characterize, and for which rigorous theories and reliable experimental data are lacking. Yet, most real or engineering' surfaces are rough on the nanometer to micrometer scale. This significantly affects their short-range interactions, their tribological behavior (adhesion, friction and lubrication) and their failure mechanisms (fracture and wear). Even when great care is taken to ensure smoothness, it is generally very difficult to produce a surface with a roughness of less than 25A except over small areas (usually for research purposes) and it is known that even a few nm of roughness can reduce the adhesion force between hard surfaces by more than an order of magnitude, and totally change their tribological behavior. To date there is no general theory for the interactions of rough surfaces nor any systematic experiments that identify the main trends; for example, how does the adhesion force or friction coefficient of a particular surface depend on its roughness? Indeed, one of the major problems is that roughness itself is not well defined. Simply quoting the RMS roughness of a surface is too simplistic, whereas describing it rigorously in terms of its Fourier components is too impractical. This whole issue has recently come to be appreciated as central to many tribological questions. We have recently performed measurements, using the SFA and scanning lateral probe techniques, on various surfaces having different roughness in an attempt to uncover some general trends and principles that describe the dependence of adhesion, friction and wear on roughness. We find, for example, that there is a generic, approximately exponential, relationship for the repulsive force between two rough surfaces, and that for non-adhering surfaces the friction force is proportional to the load (not the real contact area) at the molecular level. These and other, such as the dynamic, aspects of the tribological interactions between rough surfaces are described and discussed.
机译:最近的表面力装置(SFA)实验在分子和微观尺度下阐述了表面粗糙度和表面变形的作用,在测定粘合和摩擦方面。取决于粗糙度,还要对表面的刚度和粘弹性等其他因素,这些效果可能导致有效的粘附力为低于或高于热力学(平衡)值的数量级,这反过来决定了摩擦行为。 “理想”,即分子平滑,未被损坏,表面的相互作用现在非常了解,在理论上和实验上都很清楚。然而,这不是粗糙表面的情况,这难以定义和表征,并且缺乏严格的理论和可靠的实验数据。然而,大多数真实或工程的表面在纳米上粗糙度粗略。这显着影响了它们的短程相互作用,其摩擦学行为(粘附,摩擦和润滑)及其失效机制(骨折和磨损)。即使在很好的小心以确保平滑时,除了超过小区域(通常用于研究目的)之外,通常非常难以产生粗糙度小于25A的表面,并且众所周知,即使是几NM的粗糙度也可以减少硬表面之间的粘附力超过一个以上数量级,并完全改变其摩擦学行为。迄今为止,粗糙表面的相互作用也没有一般理论,也没有任何识别主要趋势的系统实验;例如,特定表面的粘附力或摩擦系数如何取决于其粗糙度?实际上,其中一个主要问题是粗糙度本身并不明确。简单地引用曲面的粗糙度太简单,而在其傅立叶组件方面非常严格地描述它是太不切实际的。整个问题最近被认为是许多摩擦学问题的核心。我们最近使用SFA和扫描横向探针技术进行了测量,在各种表面上具有不同的粗糙度,试图揭示描述粘附,摩擦和磨损在粗糙度上的依赖性的一般趋势和原则上。例如,我们发现,对于两个粗糙表面之间的排斥力存在通用,大致指数的关系,并且对于非粘附表面,摩擦力与分子的负载(不是真实接触区域)成比例等级。描述和讨论了这些和其他,例如粗糙表面之间的摩擦相互作用的动态的方面。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号