首页> 外文会议>International Conference of the System Dynamics Society >Meaning-making in the process of participatory system dynamics research
【24h】

Meaning-making in the process of participatory system dynamics research

机译:参与式系统动态研究过程中的意义

获取原文

摘要

Similar to validation techniques, participatory methods try to alleviate bounded rationality in the process of modelling in order to build better models. In addition, they aim to change participants understanding, decision making and actions. While good examples of best practice exist in participatory system dynamics, a unified underlying social theory of collaboration or learning, or even competing theories are missing. To support the development of a theoretically grounded participatory process, we draw on the distinction of bounded rationality represented in model content as well as in the modelling process itself and specifically draw on theories of meaning construction by George Herbert Mead and relate them to a case example in the area of housing. We argue that participatory methods should include four elements of meaning-making (i.e. gesturing, naming, acting, and iterating) in order to change participant's mental models. This will also change the contents represented in the generated system dynamics models, e.g. from a fragmented to a more holistic view.
机译:类似于验证技术,参与式方法尝试在建模过程中减轻有界合理性,以便构建更好的模型。此外,他们的目标是改变参与者的理解,决策和行动。虽然参与式系统动态中最佳实践的良好示例存在,但缺少统一的协作或学习的社会理论,甚至是竞争理论。为了支持理论上接地的参与过程的发展,我们借鉴了模型内容中所代表的有界合理性以及在建模过程中,并具体地利用George Herbert Mead的意义建设理论,并将其与案例示例相关联在住房的区域。我们认为参与式方法应包括四个意义的元素(即打手势,命名,行动和迭代),以改变参与者的心理模型。这也将改变所产生的系统动态模型中所示的内容,例如,从分散到更全面的观点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号