首页> 外文会议>International symposium on field measurements in geomechanics >Comparisons of measurements from in-soil and in-wall inclinometers
【24h】

Comparisons of measurements from in-soil and in-wall inclinometers

机译:从土壤和墙壁倾角系测量的比较

获取原文

摘要

In excavation projects involving diaphragm walls, there are options to install either in-soil or inwall inclinometers or both. In the Esplanade-Theatres on the Bay project, eight pairs of in-soil and in-wall inclinometers were installed along the perimeter of the excavation area. Selected measurements are presented and discussed. In general, both methods of installation yielded deflection profiles that are of similar trend and magnitude. The in-soil inclinometers yielded larger displacement. The in-wall incli8nometers produced smoother curves whereas the curves from the in-soil inclinometers were more jagged. Bending moments can be back-calculated from the in-wall inclinometer data, whereas those back-calculated from the in-soil inclinometers may not be reliable.
机译:在涉及隔膜墙壁的挖掘项目中,有选择在土壤或嵌入式倾角计或两者中安装。在海湾项目上的Esplanade - 剧院中,沿着挖掘区域的周边安装了八对土壤和墙壁倾角系。提出和讨论了所选测量。通常,两种安装方法都产生了类似趋势和幅度的偏转轮廓。土壤倾角仪产生较大的位移。壁内的增量曲线产生更平滑的曲线,而来自土壤中倾角仪的曲线更加锯齿。弯矩可以从壁式倾斜度计数据回来计算,而来自土壤倾角仪的那些背部计算可能不可靠。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号