首页> 外文会议>International Congress on Sound and Vibration >COMPARISON OF ACOUSTIC AND RANDOM VIBRATION TESTING FOR LARGE SPACECRAFT
【24h】

COMPARISON OF ACOUSTIC AND RANDOM VIBRATION TESTING FOR LARGE SPACECRAFT

机译:大型航天器声学和随机振动试验的比较

获取原文

摘要

Severe random vibration mechanical environment and acoustic excitation are experienced by spacecraft during launch and the vibration or acoustic test is usually to be executed in order to verify the structures. According to the relative test standards, acoustic test is recommended to be done for large spacecraft instead of random vibration, while the random vibration test instead of acoustic test is recommended for small spacecraft. Since random vibration test has seldom been done for large spacecraft, the difference between the random vibration test and acoustic test has little been studied. In order to obtain suitable test specifications for spacecraft vibration test and acoustic test, a complex assembly composed of spacecraft, fairing, satellite adapter, and instrument compartment of the upper stage for L/V is assembled specially on ground, and an acoustic test in the reverberant field for this complex assembly is accomplished. As a result, the vibration specification is extracted from the acceleration PSD with the interface of S/C and L/V, and the sound pressure level inside the fairing is utilized to specify the controlling SPL with the acoustic test. In the end, the results by the complex assembly acoustic test, the spacecraft acoustic test and the spacecraft random vibration test are compared and studied. It is shown by the comparison that the transmitting passes and frequency distribution of acoustic load differ a lot from that of the vibration excitation. The effectiveness of spacecraft acoustic test and random vibration test is assessed based on the benchmark of assembly acoustic test results. The acoustic load usually takes effect in higher frequency band and influences the outer surface of the structure, while the base random vibration is commonly more important at lower frequencies, especially for structures or components near interface of S/C and L/V.
机译:在发射期间,航天器经历了严重的随机振动机械环境和声学激发,并且通常会执行振动或声学测试以验证结构。根据相对测试标准,建议对大型航天器而不是随机振动进行声学测试,而是为小型航天器建议使用随机振动测试而不是声学测试。由于随机振动测试很少完成大型航天器,因此研究了随机振动试验和声学测试之间的差异。为了获得用于航天器振动试验和声学测试的合适的测试规范,特别地在地面上组装了由航天器,整流罩,卫星适配器和L / V的上级仪器盒组成的复杂组件,并在地上组装在地上,以及声学测试完成该复杂组件的混响场。其结果是,振动规范从加速度PSD与S / C和L / V的界面萃取,整流罩内的声压水平被用于指定与声学测试的控制SPL。最后,通过复杂装配声学测试,航天器声学测试和航天器随机振动试验的结果进行了比较和研究。通过比较示出了声载的传输通行和频率分布与振动激励的频率不同。基于组装声学测试结果的基准评估航天器声学测试和随机振动试验的有效性。声载量通常在较高频带中生效,并影响结构的外表面,而基本随机振动在较低频率下通常更重要,尤其适用于S / C和L / V接口附近的结构或组件。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号