首页> 外文会议>International Congress on Sound and Vibration >COMPARISON OF THE METHODS TO CALIBRATE THE DIFFUSE FIELD SENSITIVITY OF LABORATORY STANDARD MICROPHONE
【24h】

COMPARISON OF THE METHODS TO CALIBRATE THE DIFFUSE FIELD SENSITIVITY OF LABORATORY STANDARD MICROPHONE

机译:校准实验室标准麦克风弥漫性场敏感性方法的比较

获取原文

摘要

Sensitivity of microphone is depended on the types of sound field. In case of the pressure and free-field condition, the method for the primary calibration of laboratory standard microphone is defined in IEC standards. However, the measurement standard to calibrate the diffuse field sensitivity is still not established. Two different methods, the reciprocity calibration in a reverberation chamber and the random incidence sensitivity measurement based on the directivity measurement had been proposed to calibrate the diffuse field sensitivity of microphone. In this study, these two different approaches are compared and investigate the detailed method to achieve stable and repeatable results. To this end, a scaled-reverberation chamber having un-parallel surfaces is designed for the reciprocity calibration and the directivity measurement system is designed for the random incidence sensitivity measurement. Commonly, both approaches are to implement sound field satisfying the definition of diffuse field and the results obtained by both methods should be same, in principle. Therefore, the difference between the results of two methods comes from the imperfection of field condition. For the reciprocity method with reverberation chamber, the method to improve diffusivity is investigated by increasing the reverberation time. For the directivity measurement, the effect of wave front shape is investigated to observe the difference from the ideal case of plane wave assumption in the definition of diffuse field.
机译:麦克风的敏感度取决于声场的类型。在压力和自由场条件的情况下,在IEC标准中定义了实验室标准麦克风的主要校准的方法。但是,仍未建立校准漫射场灵敏度的测量标准。已经提出了两种不同的方法,提出了一种基于方向性测量的混响室中的互动校准和随机发生率测量来校准麦克风的漫射场敏感性。在这项研究中,比较这两种不同的方法,并研究了实现稳定和可重复的结果的详细方法。为此,设计具有未平行表面的缩放混响室,用于互动校准,并且指导性测量系统设计用于随机发生率测量测量。通常,这两种方法都是实现满足漫射场的定义的声场,并且通过两种方法获得的结果原则上应该是相同的。因此,两种方法的结果之间的差异来自现场条件的缺陷。对于具有混响室的互易性方法,通过增加混响时间来研究提高扩散率的方法。对于方向性测量,研究了波前形状的效果,观察与漫射场的定义中平面波假设的理想情况的差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号