首页> 外文会议>Digital Avionics Systems Conference >EVALUATING ELORAN AS A BACKUP FOR SURVEILLANCE AND NAVIGATION: A COMPARATIVE COST ANALYSIS
【24h】

EVALUATING ELORAN AS A BACKUP FOR SURVEILLANCE AND NAVIGATION: A COMPARATIVE COST ANALYSIS

机译:评估ELORAN作为监测和导航的备份:比较成本分析

获取原文

摘要

Over the past five years, there have been multiple studies related to backing up the Global Positioning System (GPS). The studies have mostly focused on technical and operational issues and often assumed a performance requirement that eliminated conventional ground-based navigation aids as a solution. This paper is focused on Enhanced Long Range Navigation System (eLORAN) as a backup for cooperative surveillance and area navigation (but not precision approach) and it is directed at the business case. The authors examined a scenario where conventional ground-based navigation aids are the backup for GPS and where a limited set of secondary radars is a backup for Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B). This scenario was compared with a case where eLORAN is a backup for GPS, both for navigation and ADS-B positioning, and no ground-based navigation aids or secondary radars exist, with the exception of some Instrument Landing Systems (ILSs) at major airports. Several versions of the eLORAN scenario were examined, varying the year in which eLORAN becomes the backup and when equipage begins in aircraft. In addition, sensitivity analyses were run by varying the costs of the ground-based systems and the avionics. The results indicate that strictly from a cost avoidance perspective, the savings of eliminating Secondary Surveillance Radars (SSRs), Very High Frequency Omni-directional Range (VORs), and Distance Measuring Equipment (DMEs) are smaller than the aggregate costs associated with maintaining eLORAN and the avionics costs to the users. This result is quite robust with respect to variations in the ground and avionics costs. However, if the requirement for a more robust backup than that provided by VORs, DME, and secondary radar can be made, then the case for eLORAN could be made on those grounds. Thus, the question of eLORAN as a backup rests with a better understanding of future requirements and not with cost avoidance.
机译:在过去的五年中,已经有多项研究与备份全球定位系统(GPS)有关。这些研究主要集中在技术和运营问题上,并且经常假设消除传统地面导航助剂作为解决方案的性能要求。本文专注于增强的远程导航系统(Eloran)作为合作监控和面积导航(但不是精密方法)的备份,它是指在商业案例。作者检查这样一个场景,常规的基于地面导航是用于GPS的备份,并且其中一组有限的二次雷达是用于自动相关监视 - 广播(ADS-B)的备份。将这种情况与Eloran是GPS的备份进行比较,用于导航和ADS-B定位,并且没有存在基于地面的导航助剂或次要雷达,除了主要机场的一些仪器着陆系统(ILSS) 。审查了几个Eloran情景的版本,改变了Eloran成为备用的年份以及装备在飞机中开始时。此外,通过改变基于地面的系统和航空电子学的成本来运行敏感性分析。结果表明,严格从成本避免角度来看,消除二次监视雷达(SSR),非常高频全向范围(VORS)和距离测量设备(DMES)的节省小于与维持ELORAN相关的总成本和用户的航空电子费用。对于地面和航空电子成本的变化,这一结果非常稳健。但是,如果可以进行比VORS,DME和次雷达提供的更强大的备份的要求,则可以对那些地面进行ELORAN的情况。因此,Eloran作为备份的问题依赖于对未来要求的更好理解,而不是避免成本。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号