【24h】

Weld Efficiency Factors Revisited

机译:重新审视焊接效率因素

获取原文

摘要

In recognition that pressure equipment welds that have not undergone a full volumetric inspection may contain internal defects, a weld efficiency is introduced. For spot volumetric inspection which is typically 10% of the weld length the weld efficiency is taken as 0.85. Of interest is that this factor is universally adopted in all known pressure equipment codes around the world. Its origins are obscure and to the authors' best knowledge, has gone unchallenged for the past 88 years. Additional interest is the use of 0.7 weld efficiency for a weld that has undergone no volumetric inspection. This is prevalent in many international pressure equipment code, but not all. This paper revisits these factors. It considers how they were developed and explores a more rigorous probabilistic approach based on the amount of volumetric inspection and the likelihood of defects. It also considers the closely associated design factors. Understanding also that weld technology has developed since the early 1900 and in particular with the introduction of new technologies such as submerged arc welding, it may not be unreasonable to expect these weld efficiencies to differ from that initially developed. While the paper is not conclusive in its findings, it highlights there is justification to question the weld efficiencies adopted and proposes a program to develop more rigorous values.
机译:在识别中,没有经过全容积检查的压力设备焊缝可能包含内部缺陷,引入了焊接效率。对于焊接长度的10%,焊接效率为0.85。感兴趣的是,这个因素在世界各地的所有已知压力设备代码中普遍采用。它的起源是模糊的,而作者最好的知识,在过去的88年里取消了淘汰。额外的兴趣是使用0.7焊接效率的焊缝,该焊缝不经历容积检查。这在许多国际压力设备代码中是普遍的,但并非所有的。本文重新审视了这些因素。它考虑了它们如何发展并根据体积检查量和缺陷的可能性来探索更严格的概率方法。它还考虑了密切相关的设计因素。理解焊接技术自1900年初以来已经开发,特别是在引进新技术,如浸没电弧焊接,期望这些焊接效率与最初开发的焊接效率不同可能并不无理。虽然本文在其调查结果中没有定论,但它强调有理由解决焊接效率,并提出了一个制定更严格的价值的计划。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号