首页> 外文会议>IAEE International Conference;International Association for Energy Economics >HOW HARMFUL IS THE RATE OF RETURN REGULATION? AVERCH-JOHNSON CRITIQUE REVISITED
【24h】

HOW HARMFUL IS THE RATE OF RETURN REGULATION? AVERCH-JOHNSON CRITIQUE REVISITED

机译:返还率有多有害?重新审视了AVERCH-JOHNSON批评

获取原文

摘要

Monopoly is a classic example of market failure. To protect the customers from abuse of market power, thegovernment has several policy instruments at their disposal. Historically, the rate of return regulation has been themost widely used regulatory instrument, and despite its shortcomings, it remains in use today. In this regime, theregulated company can recover the incurred costs while the customers are protected from overpaying for themonopoly services. Like any regulation regime, however, the rate of return regulation has its shortcomings.
机译:垄断是市场失灵的典型例子。为了保护客户免受滥用市场支配力, 政府有几项政策工具可供使用。从历史上看,回报率的监管一直是 它是目前使用最广泛的监管工具,尽管有其缺点,但至今仍在使用。在这种制度下, 受监管的公司可以追回已发生的费用,同时保护客户免于支付过多的费用。 垄断服务。但是,像任何监管制度一样,回报率监管也有其不足之处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号