首页> 外文会议>AIAA SciTech Forum and Exposition >Reacting RANS Simulations of a Dual-Mode Ramjet Combustor: A Code Credibility Study
【24h】

Reacting RANS Simulations of a Dual-Mode Ramjet Combustor: A Code Credibility Study

机译:双模式Ramjet燃烧器的RANS模拟反应:代码可信度研究

获取原文

摘要

Reacting Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) simulations have become an integral part of the design and analysis of dual-mode ramjet combustors (DMRJ). It is expected that solving the same equations on a sufficiently resolved grid should produce results that are independent of the flow solver used. In practice, however, slight differences in model implementation and numerical differences between the solvers might have a non-negligible influence on the results. For this study, five solvers: CFD++, Kestrel, Loci/CHEM, US3D, and VULCAN were chosen based on the authors' expertise to verify that each code behaves similarly for a generic, round DMRJ combustor. To verify turbulence model implementation within each solver, the Menter baseline two-equation model (BSL) is utilized to simulate a canonical axisymmetric transonic bump. Each solver is then used to simulate the round scramjet combustor housed in Research Cell 22 of AFRL's High Speed Systems Division. A grid refinement study was conducted using each code. Results comparing wall pressure data between the five solvers are used to define the spread of results. The spread in shock train position is approximately one quarter of the isolator duct height in the finest resolution simulated. This is considered reasonable agreement as the differences between the five solvers is shown to be negligible compared to the differences observed when alternative turbulence models are selected.
机译:反应Reynolds-Iveriged Navier-Stokes(RANS)模拟已成为双模Ramjet燃烧器(DMRJ)的设计和分析的组成部分。期望在充分解决的网格上求解相同的等式应该产生与所用流量求解器无关的结果。然而,在实践中,求解器之间的模型实施和数值差异的轻微差异可能对结果产生不可忽略的影响。对于本研究,基于作者的专业知识,选择了五个求解器:CFD ++,keestel,洛克利,洛坎特,US3D和vulcan,以验证每个代码是否与通用,圆形DMRJ燃烧器的行为类似。为了验证每个求解器内的湍流模型实现,利用了导师基线两方程模型(BSL)来模拟规范轴对称跨音凸块。然后,每个求解器都用于模拟在AFRL的高速系统划分的研究单元22中的圆形瘙痒锥燃烧器。使用每个代码进行网格细化研究。结果比较五个求解器之间的壁压数据用于定义结果的扩散。震动火车位置的差距在最佳分辨率中的隔离管道高度约四分之一。这被认为是合理的一致,因为与选择替代湍流模型时观察到的差异相比,五个求解器之间的差异可忽略不计。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号