首页> 外文会议>Conference on Medical Imaging: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment >Comparison of Variable and Fixed Focal Length Cone Beam CT in Diagnostic Imaging
【24h】

Comparison of Variable and Fixed Focal Length Cone Beam CT in Diagnostic Imaging

机译:诊断成像中可变与固定焦距锥形CT的比较

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

We use a task-based study to objectively evaluate the effect of variable versus fixed focal length in determining the position of a lesion in helical cone-beam computed tomography (HCBCT). This method will be used to assess whether variable focal length CBCT scans provide a measurable improvement in estimating lesion position relative to fixed focal length CBCT in diagnostic applications. In this simulation study a 1 cm diameter spherical lesion is placed at four different positions within a three-dimensional Shepp-Logan head phantom. The axial plane is taken to point along the z-axis, which is also the central axis of the helix. The lesion is placed at the center of the Shepp-Logan phantom, at positions displaced ±5 cm in x, and at a position displaced 5 cm in y. Four different scans of pitch length 10 cm are then performed using 128 views over 360° with a 100×300 pixel (20 cm×60 cm) detector. Two scans have a fixed focal length of 50 cm between the X-ray source and the center of rotation (COR), varying only in the starting angle of the source (0° and 90°). We call this the circular configuration. The other two scans have a variable focal length following the curvature of the head phantom and ranging from 37.5 cm to 50 cm. We call this the elliptical configuration. The detector rotates with the source but maintains a constant distance of 30 cm from the COR. A likelihood gridding technique is used to assess bias and variance in the position estimates determined from each scan configuration. We find that the biases are small relative to the variances, and have no apparent preferred direction. Of the 24 circular to elliptical comparisons made, we find that in 14 cases the elliptical scan has a smaller variance that is statistically significant(p ≤ 0.05). By contrast, we find no statistically significant cases in which the circular scan gives a smaller variance compared to the elliptical scan. We conclude that using a variable focal length adapted to the contours of the head phantom provides more precise results, but caution that; this is a limited pilot study and many more factors will be accounted for in future work.
机译:我们使用基于任务的研究来客观地评估变量与固定焦距的效果确定螺旋锥形束计算机断层扫描(HCBCT)中的病变的位置。该方法将用于评估可变焦距CBCT扫描是否在诊断应用中估计相对于固定焦距CBCT的病变位置提供可测量的改进。在该模拟研究中,1cm直径的球形病变被放置在三维Shepp-Logan阵风中的四个不同位置。轴向平面沿Z轴点将,该Z轴也是螺旋的中心轴线。将病变放置在Shepp-Logan Phantom的中心,在X中位移±5cm的位置,并且在y中位于5厘米的位置。然后使用以100×300像素(20cm×60cm)检测器超过360°以上的128视图进行四个不同的俯仰长度10cm的扫描。两个扫描在X射线源和旋转中心(COR)之间具有50cm的固定焦距,仅在源的起始角(0°和90°)中变化。我们称之为圆形配置。另外两个扫描在头部幻像的曲率下具有可变焦距,从37.5厘米到50厘米。我们称之为椭圆配置。检测器用源旋转,但从COR保持30厘米的恒定距离。似然网格技术用于评估从每个扫描配置确定的位置估计中的偏差和方差。我们发现偏差相对于差异很小,并且没有明显的优选方向。在24个循环到椭圆形比较方案中,我们发现,在14例时,椭圆扫描具有较小的差异,统计学意义(p≤0.05)。相比之下,与椭圆扫描相比,我们发现没有统计上显着的情况,其中圆扫描给出了较小的方差。我们得出结论,使用适应头部幻影轮廓的可变焦距提供更精确的结果,但请注意;这是一个有限的试点研究,将来会在未来的工作中占更多因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号