首页> 外文会议>Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment >Comparison of Variable and Fixed Focal Length Cone Beam CT in Diagnostic Imaging
【24h】

Comparison of Variable and Fixed Focal Length Cone Beam CT in Diagnostic Imaging

机译:可变焦距和固定焦距锥束CT在诊断成像中的比较

获取原文

摘要

We use a task-based study to objectively evaluate the effect of variable versus fixed focal length in determining the position of a lesion in helical cone-beam computed tomography (HCBCT). This method will be used to assess whether variable focal length CBCT scans provide a measurable improvement in estimating lesion position relative to fixed focal length CBCT in diagnostic applications. In this simulation study a 1 cm diameter spherical lesion is placed at four different positions within a three-dimensional Shepp-Logan head phantom. The axial plane is taken to point along the z-axis, which is also the central axis of the helix. The lesion is placed at the center of the Shepp-Logan phantom, at positions displaced ±5 cm in x, and at a position displaced 5 cm in y. Four different scans of pitch length 10 cm are then performed using 128 views over 360° with a 100×300 pixel (20 cm×60 cm) detector. Two scans have a fixed focal length of 50 cm between the X-ray source and the center of rotation (COR), varying only in the starting angle of the source (0° and 90°). We call this the circular configuration. The other two scans have a variable focal length following the curvature of the head phantom and ranging from 37.5 cm to 50 cm. We call this the elliptical configuration. The detector rotates with the source but maintains a constant distance of 30 cm from the COR. A likelihood gridding technique is used to assess bias and variance in the position estimates determined from each scan configuration. We find that the biases are small relative to the variances, and have no apparent preferred direction. Of the 24 circular to elliptical comparisons made, we find that in 14 cases the elliptical scan has a smaller variance that is statistically significant(p ≤ 0.05). By contrast, we find no statistically significant cases in which the circular scan gives a smaller variance compared to the elliptical scan. We conclude that using a variable focal length adapted to the contours of the head phantom provides more precise results, but caution that; this is a limited pilot study and many more factors will be accounted for in future work.
机译:我们使用基于任务的研究来客观地评估可变焦距与固定焦距在确定螺旋锥束计算机断层扫描(HCBCT)中病变位置方面的影响。此方法将用于评估可变焦距CBCT扫描相对于固定焦距CBCT在诊断应用中相对于固定焦距CBCT评估病灶位置是否可测量的改善。在此模拟研究中,将直径为1 cm的球形病变放置在三维Shepp-Logan头部模型中的四个不同位置。轴向平面沿z轴指向,z轴也是螺旋的中心轴。病变位于Shepp-Logan体模的中心,x位置偏移±5 cm,y位置偏移5 cm。然后使用100×300像素(20 cm×60 cm)检测器在360°上使用128个视图对间距长度10 cm进行四次不同的扫描。两次扫描在X射线源和旋转中心(COR)之间的固定焦距为50 cm,仅在源的起始角度(0°和90°)上发生变化。我们称其为循环配置。其他两次扫描具有可变的焦距,其跟随头模的曲率变化,范围为37.5厘米至50厘米。我们称其为椭圆形配置。检测器与源一起旋转,但与COR保持30 cm的恒定距离。似然网格技术用于评估从每个扫描配置确定的位置估计中的偏差和方差。我们发现偏差相对于方差较小,并且没有明显的首选方向。在进行的24次圆形到椭圆形比较中,我们发现在14种情况下,椭圆形扫描具有较小的方差,具有统计意义(p≤0.05)。相比之下,我们发现,与椭圆形扫描相比,没有任何统计学意义上的圆形扫描方差较小的情况。我们得出的结论是,使用适合头部幻影轮廓的可变焦距可提供更精确的结果,但请注意;这是一项有限的试点研究,将来的工作将考虑更多因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号