首页> 外文会议>ASME Power Conference >CAN PROPANE DISPLACE DIESEL AS A FUEL FOR POWER GENERATION?
【24h】

CAN PROPANE DISPLACE DIESEL AS A FUEL FOR POWER GENERATION?

机译:丙烷可以将柴油置于柴油作为发电的燃料吗?

获取原文

摘要

Access to electricity is a key necessity in today's World for economic growth and improvements in quality of life. However, the global challenge is addressing the so-called Energy Trilemma: how to provide secure, affordable electricity while minimizing the impact of power generation on the environment. The rapid growth in power generation from intermittent renewable sources, such as wind and photovoltaics, to address the environmental aspect has created additional challenges to meet the security of supply and affordable electricity aspects of this trilemma. Fossil fuels play a major role in supporting intermittent renewable power generation, rapidly providing the security of supply needed and ensuring grid stability. Globally diesel or other fuel oils are frequently used as the primary fuel or back-up fuel for fossil-fueled power generation plants at all scales, from a few kilo Watts to hundreds of MegaWatts, and helps provide millions of people with secure electricity supplies. But diesel is a high polluting fuel, emitting high levels of carbon dioxide (CO_2) per unit of fuel input compared to natural gas, as well as high levels of combustion contaminants that are potentially hazardous to the local environment and human health. Additionally, diesel can be a high cost fuel in many countries, with imports consuming significant portions of sometimes scarce foreign currency reserves. Most observers consider that natural gas is the 'fuel of choice' for fossil power generation due to its reduced CO_2 emissions compared to coal and diesel. However, access to gas supplies cannot be guaranteed even with the increased availability of Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) and Compressed Natural Gas (CNG). Additionally where natural gas is available, operators may opt for an interruptible gas supply contract which offers a lower tariff than a firm gas supply contract, therefore there is a need for a back-up fuel to ensure continuous power supplies. While traditionally diesel or Heavy Fuel Oil (HFO) has been used as fuel where gas is not available or as a back-up fuel, propane offers a cleaner and potentially lower cost alternative. This paper compares the potential economic, operational and environmental benefits of using propane as a fuel for gas turbine-based power plants or cogeneration plants.
机译:获得电力是当今世界经济增长和生活质量改善的关键必要性。然而,全球挑战正在解决所谓的能源Trielemma:如何提供安全,经济的电力,同时最大限度地减少发电对环境的影响。间歇性再生能源的发电快速增长,如风和光伏等,以解决环境方面的额外挑战,以满足这种Trilemma的供应和实惠的电力方面的安全性。化石燃料在支持间歇性可再生能源时发挥重要作用,迅速提供所需的供应安全性和确保电网稳定性。全球柴油或其他燃料油经常被用作所有鳞片的化石燃料发电厂的主要燃料或备用燃料,从几千克瓦瓦到数百名兆瓦,并有助于为数百万人提供安全的电力供应。但柴油是一种高污染燃料,与天然气相比,每单位燃料投入和高水平的燃烧污染物,对当地环境和人类健康有潜在危险的燃烧污染物,发出高水平的二氧化碳(CO_2)。此外,柴油可以是许多国家的高成本燃料,进口消耗有时稀缺的外币储备的重要部分。大多数观察家认为,由于与煤和柴油相比,由于其CO_2排放减少,天然气是化石发电的“选择”。然而,即使增加了液化天然气(LNG)和压缩天然气(CNG)的可用性,也无法保证对燃气供应的进入。此外,如果天然气可用,运营商可以选择可中断的气体供应合同,该合同提供比公司的燃气供应合同较低的资金,因此需要备用燃料来确保连续电源。虽然传统上柴油或重型燃料油(HFO)已被用作燃料,但诸如燃气不可用或作为备用燃料的燃料,丙烷提供更清洁的和可能更低的成本替代品。本文比较了使用丙烷作为燃气轮机的发电厂或热电联产厂燃料的潜在经济,操作和环境效益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号