首页> 外文会议>Joint annual meeting of the International Society of Exposure Science and the International Society for Environmental Epidemiology >Comparison between methods for analysis of insecticides in human blood using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and high performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry
【24h】

Comparison between methods for analysis of insecticides in human blood using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and high performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry

机译:气相色谱-质谱法与高效液相色谱-质谱法分析人血中杀虫剂方法的比较

获取原文

摘要

For biomonitoring of exposure to insecticides, blood sample analysis is an effective tool to assess the instant exposure without concern with metabolism in the body. Analysis using high performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LCMS) has been popularly applied and considered superior to others because of the excellent sensitivity; nevertheless, use of LCMS is never cost-effective. We have developed a rapid, sensitive, and cost-effective whole blood extraction assay method to analyze insecticides in blood using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GCMS). In this study we analyzed blood samples using the developed GCMS and regular LCMS assay methods, and compared the results side by side to show the excellence of this GCMS method as alternative. The blood samples were prepared by spiking 9 insecticides, including carbamate, organophosphates and pyrethroids, to blood that was confirmed to be blank in advance. A total of 20 pairs of spiked blood samples were prepared with the concentration being set at 10 ug/L for each compound. Pretreatment of blood samples started with extraction of whole blood and serum for analysis on GCMS and LCMS, respectively; the organic extracts were dried and reconstituted with solvent prior to the respective analyses. Results derived from both methods indicated consistency between the two methods, showing less than 8% error within the expected concentration (10 u.g/L). Comparisons between data from GCMS and LCMS also demonstrated an excellent outcome of relative errors less than 8.2%, confirming that this GCMS method was as good as LCMS in performance, and was advantageous in terms of cost effectiveness. Keywords: biomonitoring, pesticides Imidacloprid Exposure in Crape Workers Lopez-Galvez N.', Wagoner R.', Canales R.', de Zapien J.l, Rosales C.', Beamer P.'; 'University of Arizona, Tuscon, AZ, USA Imidacloprid is a neonicotinoid insecticide commonly injected through agricultural drip irrigation systems to reduce the population of vine mealybugs in grape farms. In the present study, we evaluated the exposure to imidacloprid in 20 grape workers two weeks after imidacloprid injection in the irrigation system. We administered a questionnaire on work activities, exposure characteristics, and socio-demographics. We collected personal air and hand wipe samples to determine possible inhalation and dermal exposure. We collected urine samples to quantify metabolite concentrations and we measured hand surface temperatures. Most participants migrated from the state of Chiapas, Mexico, all participants had less than high school education and about half identified an indigenous language as their first language. Imidacloprid was not detected in air samples, but it was detected in 85% of the hand wipe samples (GM: 0.41 u.g/wipe). The majority of participants (75%) had detectable concentrations of imidacloprid as a parent compound in their urine (GM: 0.15 ug/g), and almost all of the participants (95%) had detectable concentrations of 5-hydroxy-lmidacloprid, a urine metabolite, (GM: 1.79 ug/g). There was a significant correlation (p < 0.001) of the imidacloprid concentration found in hand wipes with the concentrations found in urine (rho: 0.67, and 0.79 for imidacloprid and 5-hydroxy-lmidacloprid). Hands' temperature was significantly correlated (p < 0.05) with the pesticide concentration found on hands (rho: 0.70), and the urine biomarkers (rho: 0.68, and 0.60 for imidacloprid and 5-hydroxy-lmidacloprid). No levels of exposure via the inhalation route and higher levels via dermal route were found. Our results suggested that hand wipe can be use as less intrusive measurement to assess imidacloprid exposure in farm workers. Imidacloprid urine and hand wipes concentration were significantly higher during the summer than during the spring season. Further research needs to be conducted on microclimatic conditions to evaluate and reduce dermal pesticide exposure.
机译:为了对杀虫剂的暴露进行生物监测,血样分析是评估即时暴露而无需担心体内新陈代谢的有效工具。高效液相色谱-质谱法(LCMS)进行分析已被广泛应用,并且由于其出色的灵敏度而被认为优于其他方法。但是,使用LCMS永远不会具有成本效益。我们已经开发了一种快速,灵敏且经济高效的全血提取测定方法,可使用气相色谱-质谱(GCMS)分析血液中的杀虫剂。在这项研究中,我们使用发达的GCMS和常规LCMS分析方法分析了血液样本,并并排比较了结果,以证明这种GCMS方法作为替代方法的优越性。通过向预先确认为空白的血液中掺入9种杀虫剂(包括氨基甲酸酯,有机磷酸盐和拟除虫菊酯)来制备血样。总共准备了20对加标血样,每种化合物的浓度设置为10 ug / L。血液样品的预处理从全血和血清提取开始,分别用于GCMS和LCMS分析。将有机萃取物干燥,并在进行相应分析之前用溶剂复原。两种方法得出的结果表明两种方法之间的一致性,在预期浓度(10 u.g / L)之内显示出小于8%的误差。来自GCMS和LCMS的数据之间的比较也显示出相对误差小于8.2%的出色结果,证实了这种GCMS方法的性能与LCMS一样好,并且在成本效益方面具有优势。关键词:生物监测,农药绉工人中吡虫啉的暴露Lopez-Galvez N。',Wagoner R。',Canales R。',de Zapien J.l,Rosales C。',Beamer P.'; '美国亚利桑那州塔斯康市的亚利桑那大学Imidacloprid是一种新烟碱类杀虫剂,通常通过农业滴灌系统注入,以减少葡萄农场中藤本虫的数量。在本研究中,我们在灌溉系统中注射吡虫啉两周后评估了20名葡萄工人对吡虫啉的暴露。我们对工作活动,接触特征和社会人口统计资料进行了问卷调查。我们收集了个人空气和手擦拭样品,以确定可能的吸入和皮肤接触。我们收集了尿液样本以量化代谢物浓度,并测量了手的表面温度。大多数参与者是从墨西哥恰帕斯州移居的,所有参与者的受教育程度都低于高中,大约一半的人将母语作为他们的母语。在空气样品中未检出吡虫啉,但在85%的手擦拭样品中检出了吡虫啉(GM:0.41微克/擦)。大多数参与者(75%)的尿液中可检测到吡虫啉作为母体化合物的浓度(GM:0.15 ug / g),几乎所有参与者(95%)的可检测浓度的5-羟基-吡虫啉,尿液代谢物(GM:1.79 ug / g)。湿巾中吡虫啉的浓度与尿液中的浓度存在显着相关性(p <0.001)(吡虫啉和5-羟基-吡虫啉的rho:0.67和0.79)。手的温度与手上的农药浓度(rho:0.70)和尿液生物标志物(rho:0.68,吡虫啉和5-羟基-吡虫啉为0.60)显着相关(p <0.05)。没有发现通过吸入途径的暴露水平和通过皮肤途径的较高暴露水平。我们的研究结果表明,擦拭布可以作为侵入性较小的测量方法来评估农场工人中吡虫啉的暴露量。吡虫啉的尿液和手巾的浓度在夏季比春季高得多。需要在微气候条件下进行进一步研究,以评估和减少皮肤农药的暴露。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号