首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Management Science and Engineering >Dose the Difference in Driving Rules Matter for Security?
【24h】

Dose the Difference in Driving Rules Matter for Security?

机译:为了安全起见,驾驶规则的区别是否重要?

获取原文

摘要

Left-hand traffic (LHC) and right-hand traffic (RHC) are two different rules of road adopted by countries on account of native culture and history. This paper investigates into security of road rules from the perspective of safe distance and its explaining variable drivers' response time during changing lane and overtaking. Road traffic capacity model and safe distance model are proposed to calculate safe distance based on ellipse vehicle model given that traffic capacity, driver classification, and vehicle speed and size.58 subjects are divided into LHC and RHC group tested their eye fixation in 9 regions when overtaking by eye tracker which constitutes drivers' response time. Undertaken independent-sample T test, test results indicate RHC' s overtaking safe distance distinct from LHC and RHC has shorter response time and longer safe distance.
机译:左手交通(LHC)和右手交通(RHC)是各国基于本土文化和历史而采用的两种不同的道路规则。本文从安全距离的角度研究了道路规则的安全性,并解释了变道和超车过程中可变驾驶员的响应时间。提出了基于椭圆车模型的道路交通容量模型和安全距离模型,并根据椭圆形车辆模型计算出安全距离。考虑到交通容量,驾驶员分类以及车辆速度和大小,将58位受试者分为LHC和RHC组,分别在9个区域测试他们的眼睛注视力。眼动仪超车,这构成了驾驶员的响应时间。通过独立样本T检验,测试结果表明RHC超越LHC的超越安全距离,而RHC响应时间更短,安全距离更长。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号