首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Management Science and Engineering >Dose the Difference in Driving Rules Matter for Security?
【24h】

Dose the Difference in Driving Rules Matter for Security?

机译:驾驶规则是否有关安全性的差异?

获取原文

摘要

Left-hand traffic (LHC) and right-hand traffic (RHC) are two different rules of road adopted by countries on account of native culture and history. This paper investigates into security of road rules from the perspective of safe distance and its explaining variable drivers' response time during changing lane and overtaking. Road traffic capacity model and safe distance model are proposed to calculate safe distance based on ellipse vehicle model given that traffic capacity, driver classification, and vehicle speed and size.58 subjects are divided into LHC and RHC group tested their eye fixation in 9 regions when overtaking by eye tracker which constitutes drivers' response time. Undertaken independent-sample T test, test results indicate RHC' s overtaking safe distance distinct from LHC and RHC has shorter response time and longer safe distance.
机译:左手交通(LHC)和右手交通(RHC)是各国因本土文化和历史而通过的两国不同的道路规则。本文从安全距离的角度调查了道路规则的安全性,并解释了在内的车道和超车过程中的可变驾驶员响应时间。提出了道路交通能力模型和安全距离模型以基于椭圆车辆模型计算安全距离,因为交通量,驾驶员分类和车速和尺寸分为LHC,RHC组在9个区域中测试了他们的眼睛固定通过眼跟踪器超车,构成驱动程序的响应时间。进行独立样本T检验,测试结果表明RHC超前的安全距离不同于LHC,RHC具有更短的响应时间和更长的安全距离。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号