首页> 外文会议>ASME power conference joint with ICOPE-17 >CAN PROPANE DISPLACE DIESEL AS A FUEL FOR POWER GENERATION?
【24h】

CAN PROPANE DISPLACE DIESEL AS A FUEL FOR POWER GENERATION?

机译:丙烷可以代替柴油作为发电燃料吗?

获取原文

摘要

Access to electricity is a key necessity in today's World for economic growth and improvements in quality of life. However, the global challenge is addressing the so-called Energy Trilemma: how to provide secure, affordable electricity while minimizing the impact of power generation on the environment. The rapid growth in power generation from intermittent renewable sources, such as wind and photovoltaics, to address the environmental aspect has created additional challenges to meet the security of supply and affordable electricity aspects of this trilemma. Fossil fuels play a major role in supporting intermittent renewable power generation, rapidly providing the security of supply needed and ensuring grid stability. Globally diesel or other fuel oils are frequently used as the primary fuel or back-up fuel for fossil-fueled power generation plants at all scales, from a few kiloWatts to hundreds of MegaWatts, and helps provide millions of people with secure electricity supplies. But diesel is a high polluting fuel, emitting high levels of carbon dioxide (CO_2) per unit of fuel input compared to natural gas, as well as high levels of combustion contaminants that are potentially hazardous to the local environment and human health. Additionally, diesel can be a high cost fuel in many countries, with imports consuming significant portions of sometimes scarce foreign currency reserves. Most observers consider that natural gas is the 'fuel of choice' for fossil power generation due to its reduced CO_2 emissions compared to coal and diesel. However, access to gas supplies cannot be guaranteed even with the increased availability of Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) and Compressed Natural Gas (CNG). Additionally where natural gas is available, operators may opt for an interruptible gas supply contract which offers a lower tariff than a firm gas supply contract, therefore there is a need for a back-up fuel to ensure continuous power supplies. While traditionally diesel or Heavy Fuel Oil (HFO) has been used as fuel where gas is not available or as a back-up fuel, propane offers a cleaner and potentially lower cost alternative. This paper compares the potential economic, operational and environmental benefits of using propane as a fuel for gas turbine-based power plants or cogeneration plants.
机译:电力供应是当今世界经济增长和生活质量改善的关键必要条件。但是,全球挑战正在解决所谓的能源困境:如何提供安全,负担得起的电力,同时最大程度地减少发电对环境的影响。从间歇性可再生能源(例如风能和光伏发电)迅速发展到解决环境问题,已经产生了额外的挑战,以满足这一难题的供应和可负担电力的安全性。化石燃料在支持间歇性可再生能源发电,迅速提供所需供应的安全性和确保电网稳定方面发挥着重要作用。在全球范围内,从几千瓦到几百兆瓦的各种规模的化石燃料发电厂,柴油或其他燃料油经常被用作主要燃料或备用燃料,并有助于为数百万人提供安全的电力供应。但是柴油是一种高污染的燃料,与天然气相比,每单位燃料输入排放高水平的二氧化碳(CO_2),以及高水平的燃烧污染物,这些污染物可能对当地环境和人类健康造成危害。此外,在许多国家,柴油可能是高成本的燃料,进口消耗了很大一部分,有时外汇储备很少。大多数观察家认为,天然气是化石能源发电的“首选燃料”,因为与煤和柴油相比,它减少了CO_2的排放。但是,即使液化天然气(LNG)和压缩天然气(CNG)的可用性增加,也无法保证获得天然气供应。另外,在有天然气的地方,运营商可能会选择可中断的天然气供应合同,该合同提供的电价要比牢固的天然气供应合同低,因此需要备用燃料以确保连续供电。传统上,柴油或重油(HFO)在没有天然气的情况下用作燃料或用作备用燃料,而丙烷则提供了一种更清洁,成本更低的替代方案。本文比较了将丙烷用作燃气轮机发电厂或热电联产电厂的燃料的潜在经济,运营和环境效益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号