首页> 外文会议>American Control Conference >Should the desired vehicle heading in path following of autonomous vehicles be the tangent direction of the desired path?
【24h】

Should the desired vehicle heading in path following of autonomous vehicles be the tangent direction of the desired path?

机译:自主车辆沿路径行驶的期望车辆行驶方向是否应为期望路径的切线方向?

获取原文

摘要

The path following problem for autonomous vehicles (AVs) is investigated in this paper. The desired value of the vehicle heading is commonly chosen as the tangent direction at the orthogonal projection point of vehicle CG (center of gravity) on the desired path. This paper points out that the traditional definition of the desired heading may deteriorate the path following performance, especially when the vehicle is tracking a path with large curvature. That is because the sideslip angle control and the yaw rate control are conflicting in the presence of sliding effects, and the sideslip angle cannot equal to zero when vehicle is tracking a curve path. This paper further provides an amendment to the definition of the desired heading direction, which renders the path following objective realized more accurately. In the controller design phase, backstepping is used to generate the required yaw rate, which has a form of the P controller, then an LQR controller is adopted to obtain the optimal active front steering (AFS) input. The Carsim-Simulink joint simulation verifies the reasonability of the amendment to the heading error.
机译:本文研究了自主车辆(AVS)问题后的路径。车辆出头的所需值通常被选择为在所需路径上的车辆CG(重心)的正交投影点处的切线方向。本文指出所需标题的传统定义可能会使性能下降,特别是当车辆跟踪具有大曲率的路径时。即,由于侧滑角控制和横摆率控制在存在滑动效果时冲突,并且当车辆跟踪曲线路径时,侧滑角不能等于零。本文进一步提供了对所需标题方向的定义的修改,这使得在物镜更准确地实现之后的路径。在控制器设计阶段中,BackStepping用于生成所需的横摆率,其具有P控制器的形式,然后采用LQR控制器获得最佳主动前转向(AFS)输入。 Carsim-Simulink联合仿真验证了修正标题错误的合理性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号