首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Computer Science >Comparisons and performance evaluations of RNA-seq alignment tools
【24h】

Comparisons and performance evaluations of RNA-seq alignment tools

机译:RNA-seq比对工具的比较和性能评估

获取原文

摘要

Next generation sequencing (NGS) has been widely used in biological and medical researches. NGS facilitates identifying mutations and differentially expressed genes that are causative to diseases. However, its high-throughput feature poses major challenges in performing the analysis, especially the alignment step. The alignment step is critical in the NGS gene expression analysis since the correctness of the advanced steps heavily depends on it. Therefore, we evaluated the performances of the four popular alignment algorithms including Tophat, STAR, MapSplice, and GNSAP based on the simulated data generated by Flux-Simulator. Shorter and longer reference genomes and read lengths were evaluated in the four scenarios. Three indices including time cost, alignment accuracy, and junction detection were utilized to consider the performances of different algorithms. The result shows that the Tophat algorithm has highest alignment accuracy and the STAR algorithm is the fastest one with a little lower accuracy. The MapSplice and GNSAP algorithms are not stable as the STAR and Tophat algorithms, and might encounter more problems in doing the alignment.
机译:下一代测序(NGS)已被广泛用于生物学和医学研究。 NGS有助于鉴定导致疾病的突变和差异表达基因。但是,其高通量功能在执行分析(尤其是比对步骤)时提出了重大挑战。对齐步骤在NGS基因表达分析中至关重要,因为高级步骤的正确性在很大程度上取决于它。因此,我们根据Flux-Simulator生成的模拟数据评估了Tophat,STAR,MapSplice和GNSAP四种流行的对齐算法的性能。在四种情况下评估了较短和较长的参考基因组和读取长度。利用时间成本,对准精度和结点检测这三个指标来考虑不同算法的性能。结果表明,Tophat算法具有最高的对齐精度,而STAR算法是最快的算法,但精度较低。 MapSplice和GNSAP算法不如STAR和Tophat算法稳定,并且在进行对齐时可能会遇到更多问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号