首页> 外文会议>ASME bioengineering conference >CHANGES IN FORAMINAL GEOMETRY WITH ANTERIOR DECOMPRESSION VERSUS KEYHOLE FORAMINOTOMY IN THE CERVICAL SPINE: A BIOMECHANICAL INVESTIGATION
【24h】

CHANGES IN FORAMINAL GEOMETRY WITH ANTERIOR DECOMPRESSION VERSUS KEYHOLE FORAMINOTOMY IN THE CERVICAL SPINE: A BIOMECHANICAL INVESTIGATION

机译:颈椎前房减压与钥匙孔钻孔术的孔眼几何变化:生物力学研究

获取原文

摘要

Cervical spondylosis can be treated with various surgical decompression techniques, notably anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) and posterior keyhole foraminotomy. Although each procedure has distinct methods, there is no compelling evidence in the literature to advocate one over the other. Furthermore, subtle differences within the techniques have yet to be examined such as the salvage or resection of uncovertebral joints during ACDF. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses have not elucidated significant differences in pain improvement between ACDF techniques, and no study has compared clinical outcomes for ACDF versus posterior foraminotomy, the two most popular cervical decompression techniques to date. We provide benchtop evidence as to the relative effectiveness of foraminotomy, ACDF with or without resection, and a combination of all surgeries. We hypothesized that ACDF with uncovertebral resection would be most effective to open the neuroforamina. Results of this study inform best practices for cervical decompression surgeries.
机译:可以使用各种外科减压技术治疗颈椎病,特别是前颈减压融合术(ACDF)和后锁孔切开术。尽管每种方法都有不同的方法,但文献中没有令人信服的证据主张一种方法优于另一种方法。此外,在技术上的细微差异尚待检查,例如ACDF期间抢救或切除椎侧关节。系统评价和荟萃分析尚未阐明ACDF技术在疼痛改善方面的显着差异,也没有研究将ACDF与后路椎间孔切开术(迄今为止两种最流行的颈椎减压技术)的临床结果进行比较。我们提供了有关开孔术,行或不行切除的ACDF以及所有手术相结合的相对有效性的台式证据。我们假设进行无椎体切除的ACDF将最有效地打开神经孔。这项研究的结果为宫颈减压手术提供了最佳实践方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号